Hurra Vs. Hurra, a judgment in ignorance of elementary jurisprudence
Hurra Vs. Hurra, a judgment in ignorance of elementary jurisprudence Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 Judgments are of two types. The first category is where a judgment, whether right or wrong, is final, authoritative and binding. The second category is where the judgment is not authoritative, binding and final, even where it is right. The […]
Progeny Judges’ Chart- Supreme Court of India
Progeny Judges’ Chart- Supreme Court of India Mathews J Nedumpara President, NLC 98205 35428 Progeny Judges’ Chart- Supreme Court of India The truth of the Indian judiciary has long been hidden from the public domain. The contempt jurisdiction was used as a tool to prevent the people of this country coming to know what truly […]
Simple solution for reducing pendency of cases is to do away with “precedents” nay, repeal of Article 141 of the Constitution.
Simple solution for reducing pendency of cases is to do away with “precedents” nay, repeal of Article 141 of the Constitution. Mathews J. Nedumpara 98205 35428 Simple things can be done in simple ways; Hard things too can be done in simple ways; But it requires an inventive brain And can be done without much […]
A JUDGE IS FREE TO ERROR WITHIN HIS JURISDICTION, BUT NOT OTHERWISE.
A JUDGE IS FREE TO ERROR WITHIN HIS JURISDICTION, BUT NOT OTHERWISE. Mathews J. Nedumpara It is a fundamental principle of law that a Court is free to error within its jurisdiction and, howsoever erroneous its decision is, it could be final and binding. Dhananjoy Chatterjee, a poor and young watchman, was found guilty […]
Could reason be overruled?
Could reason be overruled? 98205 35428 Mathews J Nedumpara We live in a strange era, right from the law student to the eminent of the eminent lawyers, have no idea what the law of the land is! The moment a litigant enters the chamber of a lawyer and asks for the solution of a legal […]
BASIC STRUCTURE THEORY – A PROPOSITION CONTRARY TO THE FIRST PRINCIPLES OF JURISPRUDENCE.
BASIC STRUCTURE THEORY – A PROPOSITION CONTRARY TO THE FIRST PRINCIPLES OF JURISPRUDENCE. Mathews J Nedumpara 9820535428 Kesavananda Bharati’s case is hailed to be the most important judgment ever rendered by the Supreme Court of India. The case was heard by the full court consisting of 13 judges. The case was argued for 6 months […]
TEN MYTHS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
TEN MYTHS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW -Mathews J. Nedumpara Introduction In the NLC’s (National Lawyer’s Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms) agenda, open selection of judges of High Courts and the Supreme Court by notification of vacancies and invitation and application of all eligibles, so too, references from all stake holders, finds the very first […]
~QUESTIONS OF LAW~
~QUESTIONS OF LAW~ (Mathews J Nedumpara) (A) If a surgeon of a Government hospital, who conducts a cesarean operation, negligently leaves a scissor inside the belly of the patient leading to fatal consequences is liable under civil and criminal laws; so too the State, his employer, will not similar principle apply in a case, as […]
No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth”- Plato A look at our legal system
No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth- Plato A look at our legal system -Mathews J. Nedumpara 98205 35428 1. We have inherited from the British, a wonderful legal system. In doing so, the British was not doing us any charity. They needed a sound legal system for the governance of […]
Nothing is more laughable and contrary to the elementary principles of jurisprudence than the so-called basic structure theory, based on which the Supreme Court has rendered hundreds of judgements and even quashed the NJAC.
Nothing is more laughable and contrary to the elementary principles of jurisprudence than the so-called basic structure theory, based on which the Supreme Court has rendered hundreds of judgments and even quashed the NJAC. Mathews J. Nedumpara 98205 35428 It is known even to a law student that only a person aggrieved, namely, one whose […]