Nedumpara

“Anti-social elements i.e. FERA violators, bride burners and a whole horde of reactionaries have found their haven in the Supreme Court” does not amount to contempt of court, but the words “people do experience corruption at the various levels of the judiciary; for the poor and the disadvantaged, this can worsen the issue of access to justice” do. Why?

Mathews J Nedumpara98205 354288th March 26 Judicial corruption is an undeniable truth. Before the PIL era, the Supreme Court was confined to its legitimate role as an adjudicator of what lawyers understand as a lis — a final court of appeal. PILs, which started as pro bono litigation to make justice accessible to those denied […]

I humbly beseech Modi ji to support my plea for the restoration of the NJAC.

Mathews J. Nedumpara 29.03.2026 98205 35428 Modiji has been a remarkable success in many areas and, in particular, in digitalization of the economy and on foreign policy and in particular in dealing with Pakistan. However, when it comes to combating judicial corruption and improbity and in bringing judicial reforms, he has been a monumental failure. […]

Why Justice Krishna Iyer said “Contempt power cipherises its user

Mathews J. Nedumpara 8.2.2023 1. What prompts me to pen these lines are the news reports that the Kerala High Court has initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Shri K.M Shahjahan, Private Secretary to Shri V.S Achuthanandan, the former Chief Minister of Kerala. Shri K.M Shahjahan has reportedly alleged that it was not merely, Adv […]