Nedumpara & Nedumpara
Nedumpara & Nedumpara is a law firm founded by Shri Mathews J. Nedumpara who enrolled with the Bar Council of Kerala in the year 1984. He has wide experience in almost all branches of law, civil, criminal, constitutional, banking, finance and company law. He is a lawyer committed to public cause particularly in the realm of transparency and accountability in judiciary.
He founded the National Lawyers’ Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms in the year 2010. The firm primarily operates from Mumbai and undertakes work in all major metropolitan cities and handles matters in the High Courts of Delhi, Karnataka, Madras, Kerala and the Supreme Court.
Latest Updates
- 16 January 2026
Application for open court hearing.
DraftSCI Mathews J Nedumpara and othersVs.Supreme Court of India and others Review Petition( Justice varma)
- 16 January 2026
Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. V.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO.
- 16 September 2025
An order pronounced in open
Speaking to the minutes of the order dated 3rd September, 2025, conducted through VC 1.
- 16 September 2025
Why the basic structure is
Mathews j nedumpara 98205 35428 14th September 2025 I am often asked why I
Today's Top Legal Headlines
Stay informed with breaking legal news from around the world
Application for open court hearing.
- 16 January 2026
DraftSCI Mathews J Nedumpara and othersVs.Supreme Court of India and others Review Petition( Justice varma) Application for open court hearing.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. V. Gangapurwala The Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicature at Madras
- 16 January 2026
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION
An order pronounced in open court cannot be altered except in an open court hearing
- 16 September 2025
Speaking to the minutes of the order dated 3rd September, 2025, conducted through VC 1. The popular concept among litigants,
Why the basic structure is a fraud on the constitution – explained in a few words
- 16 September 2025
Mathews j nedumpara 98205 35428 14th September 2025 I am often asked why I call the “basic structure” a
Filter by Jurisdiction
Get targeted legal news from specific countries and regions
Today’s (May 11, 2026) Supreme Court judgment on Ojha, President of the Gujarat High Court Advocates Association, proves once again that the bar is dead; only a requiem remains.
“Final Act Of Forgiveness” : Supreme Court Keeps Senior Advocate Yatin Oza’s Contempt Conviction In Abeyance Indefinitely https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-keeps-senior-advocate-yatin-ozas-contempt-conviction-in-abeyance-indefinitely-533686…
Read MoreSuo motu PIL in the matter of ill-treatment of lawyers in the Supreme Court today ie.11th May 26
Mathews J Nedumpara98205 35428Delhi. Suo motu PIL in the matter of ill-treatment of lawyers in the Supreme Court…
Read MoreWhy doesn’t a judgment under Article 226 or 32 constitute res judicata?
The doctrine of res judicata belongs to the realm of evidence. It is for the party who pleads…
Read MoreFeautured articles
Today’s (May 11, 2026) Supreme Court judgment on Ojha, President of the Gujarat High Court Advocates Association, proves once again that the bar is dead; only a requiem remains.
“Final Act Of Forgiveness” : Supreme Court Keeps Senior Advocate Yatin Oza’s Contempt Conviction In Abeyance Indefinitely https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-keeps-senior-advocate-yatin-ozas-contempt-conviction-in-abeyance-indefinitely-533686 Mathews J Nedumpara98205 35428.11th May 2026. Sri Ojha is a good friend
Suo motu PIL in the matter of ill-treatment of lawyers in the Supreme Court today ie.11th May 26
Mathews J Nedumpara98205 35428Delhi. Suo motu PIL in the matter of ill-treatment of lawyers in the Supreme Court today ie.11th May 26. Across the width and breadth of this country,
Why doesn’t a judgment under Article 226 or 32 constitute res judicata?
The doctrine of res judicata belongs to the realm of evidence. It is for the party who pleads it as a bar to establish it. Ordinarily, a litigant has a
Voicing the Need for Reform, Accountability, and Fair Justice
Our Supreme Court is termed as the most powerful court on the planet by the so-called eminent jurists. Even the ordinary civil courts can declare an Act of Parliament to be unconstitutional, though the power is not used in actual practice. Our Supreme Court and High Courts declare even Constitutional Amendments as void.
However, our judiciary has failed as an institution to deliver to the consumers of justice, the litigants, the public at large. Millions of the poor and underprivileged languish in jail pending trial and those convicted of serious offences spend a life time in jail waiting for their appeal to be heard. Criminal appeals of those on death row for decades are pending. The less said about the pendency in civil cases, D.V cases involving widow and women in distress, the better. Our judiciary continues to be the most feudal, while judiciary elsewhere around the world have become more people friendly and diverse.
Latest Podcast
Live streaming of court proceedings and preservation is an integral part Articles 14, 19 and 21.
Latest Vlog
Live streaming of court proceedings and preservation is an integral part Articles 14, 19 and 21.
Petitions
Nedumpara & Nedumpara, founded by Shri Mathews J. Nedumpara, is a leading law firm committed to judicial transparency and excellence, with a strong presence across major Indian High Courts and the Supreme Court.
Application for open court hearing.
DraftSCI Mathews J Nedumpara and othersVs.Supreme Court of India and others Review Petition( Justice varma) Application for open court hearing.
To declare that the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is unconstitutional and void, or at least Sections 2(c)(i), 14, 16 and 17(5) thereof
CLICK BELOW TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THE ARTICLE Writ Petition by MJN against Contempt jurisdiction filed before HC Kerala
Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. V. Gangapurwala The Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicature at Madras
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION
In the 10yr period between 2011 to 2020
Mathews J Nedumpara98205 35428 In the 10yr period between 2011 to 2020 a)Review petitions (civil) dismissed- 19710Allowed- 92 b) Review
BEFORE THE HONOROUBLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMW.A. No. of 2024(Against the order dated 23-10-2024 of this Honourable Court
BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Writ Appeal. No. In of 2024 W.P. (C) No. 41576 of 2023
BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMWrit Appeal No.Inof 2024W.P. (C) No. 41576 of 2023(Against the Judgment dated
Stay Informed with Legal Insights
Get the latest legal news, case studies, and jurisdiction updates delivered to your preferred channel
- SMS
