26 February

Sticky

J.C.S.Karnan_Review Petition of Judgment(08.07.2017_ ACP+CJJ)

A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. _____ OF 2017 IN SUO MOTU CONMT.PET.(C)NO.1 OF 2017 ((Seeking review of the judgments dated 09/05/2017 & 04/07/2017 passed by this Hon’ble Court in SUO MOTU CONMT.PET.(C) NO.1 OF 2017) Justice C.S. Karnan ………..Review Petitioner IN THE MATTER OF: Supreme Court of India on its own motion … Suo Moto Versus Justice C.S. Karnan … Original Alleged Contemnor/Respondent OFFICE REPORT ON LIMITATION The review petition is within time. The Petition is barred by time and there is a delay of _____days in filing the same against orders dated 09/05/2017 & 04/07/2017 and application for condonation of ___days delay...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

J.C.S.Karnan_Review Petition Covering Letter to Secretary General

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA Advocate NEDUMPARA & NEDUMPARA Law Firm 304, Hari Chambers, 3rd Floor, 58-64, S.B.S. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400 023 & 210, PrasannaVihar Apartments, Near High Court, Cochin, Kerala-682 031 Ph: +91 98205 35428(M), 02222626634, 04842368737, 02222626432,01122146145 E-mail: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com To Ld.Secretary General, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi-1. Sub: Filing of: REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. _____ OF 2017 IN SUO MOTU CONMT.PET.(C)NO.1 OF 2017 (Seeking review of the judgments dated 09/05/2017 & 04/07/2017 passed by this Hon’ble Court in SUO MOTU CONMT.PET.(C) NO.1 OF 2017) Justice C.S. Karnan ………..Review Petitioner IN THE MATTER OF: Supreme Court of India on its own motion … Suo Moto Versus Justice C.S. Karnan … Original Alleged Contemnor/Respondent Sir, Being the duly...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Writ Petition for law against judicial defamation by Mathews J Nedumpara

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINAY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. ______ OF 2018 Mathews J Nedumpara Aged: 59 Years, Occ. Practicing Advocate Adult, Indian Inhabitant, residing at Harbour Heights, 12-F, 12th Floor, Sassoon Docks, Colaba, Mumbai-400 005. ……Petitioner Versus The Hon’ble Shri Justice S J Kathawalla, Judge, The Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Mumbai-36. …..Respondent TO THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE OTHER HONOURABLE PUISNE JUDGES OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT HUMBLE PETITION OF THE PETITIONER ABOVE NAMED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Letter to the PM demanding review of the NJAC case by the Union of India

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

TELEGRAPHIC LETTER FOR THE ATTENTION OF PM 29 April 2018 To, Hon’ble Sri Narendra Modi, The Prime Minister of India Room No. 246, South Block, Raisina Hills, New Delhi Hon’ble Sri Modi Ji Subject: 1. Review of the NJAC case 2. Dismantling of the collegium 3. Audience with your kind self. Ref: Umpteen letters addressed to your Hon’ble self, some of which have not even been acknowledged. I address you sir, in a telegraphic language as the President of NLC in the hope that atleast this will receive your personal attention in view of the great national importance of the subject. 1. I was the only person who instituted a Substantive Petition...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Notes of Argument in the High Court of Kerala.

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO 11086 OF 2018 C J Joveson ...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Notes of Argument in Kerala High Court in Writ Petition Challenging the Kerala High Court Recommendations

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO 11086 OF 2018 C J Joveson ...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Argument Notes of Mr.Nedumpara in Joveson Vs Chief justice of Kerala in challenge of the recommendations of the Collegium picking up the kith and kin of the judges as judges of the Kerala HC.

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO 11086 OF 2018 C J Joveson ...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

They Could Do No Better

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

They Could Do No Better...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Suggesting the obvious

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WP(C) NO. 861/2018 IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Mathews J. Nedumpara And Others PETITIONERS Versus The Supreme Court of India and Others RESPONDENTS TO THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA AND HIS COMPANION JUDGES OF THEHON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA HUMBLE SUGGESTIONS BY THE PETITIONERS ABOVENAMED MOST RESPECTFULLY SHEWETH: The Audio-Video Recording of Judicial Proceedings is a measure which is very safe and easy to implement, as the Petitioners had directly witnessed the same in a Contempt of Court Proceedings at the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court, as Counsels, where it was implemented on mere application of the Contemnor without calling for any suggestions....

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

“Ratio” of the judges 2 and the NJAC cases

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

“RATIO” OF THE JUDGES 2 AND THE NJAC CASES -Mathews J. Nedumpara The Supreme Court in Keshavanada Bharati held that the “basic structure” of the constitution is inviolable though fundamental rights could be violated. In Indira Nehru Gandhi and Minerva Mills it was held that from 24.04.1973, the validity of a statute has to be tested on the Basic Structure. Independence of Judiciary is one of the Basic features of the constitution. The independence of the judiciary is not about the independent discharge of the functions of a judge subsequent to his appointment but is all about the very appointment, i.e., who...

Disclaimer: