Why does my call for essential, multi-pronged judicial reform remain a voice in the wilderness? Why do good men remain silent?
1. There are ever so many good men and women serving as judges and senior lawyers. I have had occasion to interact with many of them—contemporaries and seniors—on the subject of judicial reforms. They agree with me that our justice delivery system is in near shambles, and they privately concur that a few simple measures […]
The folly of Kesavananda Bharati’s basic structure theory unfolded in three sentences.
Mathews J Nedumpara. 98205 35428 1st March 2026 The Supreme Court created the collegium system where judges appoint themselves—nay, anoint their kith and kin as judges—and also struck down the NJAC on the ground that the independence of the judiciary is a basic structure and that any system of appointment in which judges do not […]
I humbly beseech Modi ji to support my plea for the restoration of the NJAC.
Mathews J. Nedumpara 29.03.2026 98205 35428 Modiji has been a remarkable success in many areas and, in particular, in digitalization of the economy and on foreign policy and in particular in dealing with Pakistan. However, when it comes to combating judicial corruption and improbity and in bringing judicial reforms, he has been a monumental failure. […]
A National Call Against the Wilful Denial of Justice to MSMEs and the Poor, and for Judicial Reforms
Mathews J. NedumparaPresidentNational Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms 98205 35428 2nd March 2026 A National Call Against the Wilful Denial of Justice to MSMEs and the Poor, and for Judicial Reforms Magistrates across the length and breadth of this country pass orders directing the forceful dispossession of MSMEs from their properties, thereby depriving […]
Kudos to Rishi Kumar! His words are the voice of the people—the voice of God against the judicial abuse of power.
Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 27.03.2026 Rishi Kumar, a final-year law student at TN National Law University, is a role model for the Bar, and perhaps even the Bench, of the world’s largest democracy. He has shown what it means to raise one’s voice for freedom of conscience and free speech.His blog post—stating “the Supreme […]
Banks and Financial Institutions cannot simultaneously initiate recovery proceedings under both the SARFAESI Act and the RDB Act; judgments holding otherwise are rendered per incuriam and sub silentio, and are not binding..
Click on the link below to read full article👇 SC Converted WP_Sark Spice_Parallel proceedings
Why Justice Krishna Iyer said “Contempt power cipherises its user
Mathews J. Nedumpara 8.2.2023 1. What prompts me to pen these lines are the news reports that the Kerala High Court has initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Shri K.M Shahjahan, Private Secretary to Shri V.S Achuthanandan, the former Chief Minister of Kerala. Shri K.M Shahjahan has reportedly alleged that it was not merely, Adv […]
When a matter is part heard, to take precipitatory action is nothing short of contempt of court
MATHEWS NEDUMPARA ADVOCATES 101,Gundecha Chamber, Nagindas Master Road, fort, Mumbai – 400 001. Email id: nedumparaassociates@gmail.com Contact No. 9447165650/9820535428 ===================================================================================== To, 12.09.2025 1. Raval Shah & Co. Advocate for ICICI Bank Building no. 5-7, Rajabahadur Mansion, Homi Modi street, fort, Mumbai – 400 023. 2. Yahya Batatawala Advocate for IRP Office no. 311, 3rd Floor, […]
An order pronounced in open court cannot be altered except in an open court hearing
Speaking to the minutes of the order dated 3rd September, 2025, conducted through VC 1. The popular concept among litigants, lawyers and even judges is that what constitutes an order or judgment which binds the party before the court is the order which is signed by the judge and authenticated and made available to the […]
Why the basic structure is a fraud on the constitution – explained in a few words
Mathews j nedumpara 98205 35428 14th September 2025 I am often asked why I call the “basic structure” a laughable theory. I can answer this in a few words by citing an example. If one were to invoke Article 32 prior to Kesavananda Bharati, the judges would unfailingly ask “why are you here? And […]