The NLC Writ Petition Challenging the Transfer of Justice Jayant Patel

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) NO. ________OF 2017 BETWEEN National Lawyers’ Campaign For Judicial Transparency and Reforms, represented by its Secretary (Litigation) Mr. A. C. Philip, having its registered office at: 304, Hari Chambers, 3rd Floor, 54/68 SBS Marg, Near Old Custom House, Fort Mumbai- 400 023              … PETITIONER No.1   Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Cabinet Secretary Government of India, South Block, Rashtrapati Bhawan, New Delhi 110 004                                  … Respondent No.1     Secretary, (Department of Justice) Jaisalmer House, 26, Mansingh Road, New Delhi-110 011.                                          ………Respondent No.2   Collegium of Supreme Court, Represented by Registrar General The Supreme Court of India, TilakMarg, New Delhi-110 001, India.                                                              … Respondent No.3   Chairman, Parliamentary Standing Committee on Law and Justice Parliament...

Continue reading

Covering Letter ACP Law Firm

A.C.PHILIP ADVOCATE NEDUMPARA & NEDUMPARA Law Firm 304, Hari Chambers, 3 rd Floor, 58/64 SBS Marg, Near Old Customs House, Fort, Mumbai - 400 023. #89, Shreshta Vihar, Ground Floor, New Delhi - 92. Tel:022 - 22626432; 022 - 22626634/ 011 22146145 ; Mob: +91 09769110823 , E - mail: pradeeparingada@gmail.com To The Hon'ble Union Minister for Home Affairs , Shri Rajnath Singh , Ministry of Home Affairs, North Block , Central Secretariat , New Delhi – 110001 . Sir, Sub: Memorandum/Representation under Article 72 of the Constitution of India by Justice C.S. Karnan seeking remission of his sentence of six months imposed on him by a seven - judge bench of the Supreme Court, preferred through his counsels, Shri Mathews J.N edumpara, B.K.Adhikari, A.C.Philip and C.J.Joveson . Ref: The memorandum dated 17.05.2017, under article 72 of the Constitution by Hon'ble Shri Justice C.S. Karnan, Judge, High Court of Judicature at Calcutta through his lawyers, which has since been forwarded by the...

Continue reading

Justice Karnans application for Remission to H.E.The President of India(A4)

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA Advocate 304, Hari Chambers, 3 rd Floor, 58 - 64, S.B.S. Road, Fort, Mumbai - 400 023 Ph: +91 98205 35428(M), 02222626634, 04842368737, 02222626432,01122146145 E - mail: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com To His Excellency Shri. Ram Nath Kovind, President of India, Rashtrapati Bhavan, Raisina Hill, New Delhi,110 004. Sub . : Memorandum/Representation under Article 72 of the Constitution of India by Justice C.S. Karnan seeking remission of his sentence of six months imposed on him by a seven - judge bench of the Supreme Court, preferred through his counsels, Shri Mathews J. Nedump ara, B.K.Adhikari, A.C. Philip and C .J. Joveson R ef . : 1. The memorandum dated 17.05.2017, under article 72 of the Constitution by Hon'ble Shri Justice C.S. Karnan, Judge, High Court of Judicature at Calcutta through his lawyer s , which has since been forwarded by the President’s secretary to the Ministry of Home, which has since been pending there. 2. Letter dated 13.05.2017, by Justice...

Continue reading

“Supreme Court must act as one and be one”?!

'-Mathews J. Nedumpara What prompted me to pen these few lines is recent Free Press Journal front page headline, “Supreme Court must act as one and be one”. The newspaper report quoted Justice Kurien Joseph saying, “the system exists on certain holy principles, tinkering with it will have no end and the institution will go for ever…when the court is one, it must act as one. If you want it to be one, you will have to make it one.” Justice Joseph so observed while on Bench with Justices Lokur and Gupta. I must confess, I was shocked, for Justice Joseph is...

Continue reading

Sickness of the Banking industry – Writ Petition

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.________OF 2018 (D)No. 6925/2018 BETWEEN MATHEWS J.NEDUMPARA AND ORS. …..Petitioners VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. …Respondents P A P E R – B O O K[FOR INDEX KINDLY SEE INSIDE] ADVOCATES FOR THE PETITIONERS:RABIN MAJUMDER SYNOPSIS AND LIST OF DATES The reason for sickness of the Banking industry was nothing but the sickness of the economy. If the economy is on the right path, namely, the manufacturing, service, trade and commerce Industries, the Banks will face no difficulty in recovering the amount lent. The Banking industry in this country is in dire straits. No amount of window dressing can conceal it...

Continue reading

Avinash Shingnapurkar Versus Union of India & ors

BEFORE THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II, Mumbai SECURITISATION APPEAL NO.               OF 2018     Avinash Shingnapurkar                                      … Plaintiff/Applicant   Versus   Union of India & ors                                            … Respondents                 ORIGINAL SUIT/ APPEAL/APPLICATION UNDER Section 17 OF THE Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 READ WITH Sections 34, 35 AND 37 THEREOF AND SUB-Sections (6) TO (11) and (25) OF Section 19 OF THE Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act,1993 PREFERRED BY THE Appellant/ Appellant THROUGH its COUNSELS MRS. ROHINI M. AMIN     Dated this _______  day of February 2018                   MRS.ROHINI M.AMIN Advocates for Appellants, 304, Hari Chambers, 3rd Floor, SBS Marg, Near Old Customs House Fort, MUMBAI- 400 023 (Mobile:...

Continue reading

The power of the Parliament to enact law, even to undo judgements, is unquestionable

The power of the Parliament to enact law, even to undo judgements, is unquestionable Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 26.01.23. The power of the Parliament to enact law, even to undo judgements, is unquestionable Nothing could be more contrary to the elementary principles of jurisprudence than to assert that the legislature cannot enact a law to ineffect a judgement. It is so unfortunate that the SC has been asserting so time and time again. It did so in the Mullaperiyar case declaring the law enacted by the Kerala legislature to undo the judgement of a 3-judge bench holding that the dam will supposedly remain safe...

Continue reading

Collegium, a fraud on the Constitution.

Collegium, a fraud on the Constitution. Mathews J Nedumpara President, NLC 98205 35428 24.11.2022. Collegium, a fraud on the Constitution. The judges of the SCI are appointed by the collegium of judges. The Collegium is unknown to our Constitution. The judges created it in 1993 by rewriting the Constitution. They had no authority to do so at all. It was a fraud played by a few powerful lawyers in Delhi on the Constitution. They did so to subserve their narrow, vested interests. Because an all powerful Supreme Court is extremely profitable for them. They could do so easily, taking advantage of the ignorance of the...

Continue reading

Loot the Adanis and Ambanis if you have to, but spare the taxpayers- A request to Mr. Fali Nariman

Loot the Adanis and Ambanis if you have to, but spare the taxpayers- A request to Mr. Fali Nariman Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 13.11.2022 I am once again surprised to come across an order of the Government of Kerala, law department dated 3.11.2022 in the social media titled 'payment of professional fees to Shri Fali S Nariman, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, for providing 'written legal opinion in Re Kerala Legislative Assembly Bills'. On verifying I had no reason to doubt the genuineness of the order which has become viral on social media. The Government order states that the Government has sanctioned a total...

Continue reading

Disclaimer:


The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to our firm of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation or advertisement by us. The contents of this website is intended purely for educational and informational purposes and should not be construed as soliciting, advertisement or as legal advice.


The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Nedumpara & Nedumpara. No material on this site may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted or distributed in any way without the prior written permission of Nedumpara & Nedumpara.