26 February

Sticky

Writ Petition for law against judicial defamation by Mathews J Nedumpara

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINAY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. ______ OF 2018 Mathews J Nedumpara Aged: 59 Years, Occ. Practicing Advocate Adult, Indian Inhabitant, residing at Harbour Heights, 12-F, 12th Floor, Sassoon Docks, Colaba, Mumbai-400 005. ……Petitioner Versus The Hon’ble Shri Justice S J Kathawalla, Judge, The Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Mumbai-36. …..Respondent TO THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE OTHER HONOURABLE PUISNE JUDGES OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT HUMBLE PETITION OF THE PETITIONER ABOVE NAMED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Letter to the PM demanding review of the NJAC case by the Union of India

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

TELEGRAPHIC LETTER FOR THE ATTENTION OF PM 29 April 2018 To, Hon’ble Sri Narendra Modi, The Prime Minister of India Room No. 246, South Block, Raisina Hills, New Delhi Hon’ble Sri Modi Ji Subject: 1. Review of the NJAC case 2. Dismantling of the collegium 3. Audience with your kind self. Ref: Umpteen letters addressed to your Hon’ble self, some of which have not even been acknowledged. I address you sir, in a telegraphic language as the President of NLC in the hope that atleast this will receive your personal attention in view of the great national importance of the subject. 1. I was the only person who instituted a Substantive Petition...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Notes of Argument in the High Court of Kerala.

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO 11086 OF 2018 C J Joveson ...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Notes of Argument in Kerala High Court in Writ Petition Challenging the Kerala High Court Recommendations

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO 11086 OF 2018 C J Joveson ...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Argument Notes of Mr.Nedumpara in Joveson Vs Chief justice of Kerala in challenge of the recommendations of the Collegium picking up the kith and kin of the judges as judges of the Kerala HC.

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO 11086 OF 2018 C J Joveson ...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

They Could Do No Better

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

They Could Do No Better...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Suggesting the obvious

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WP(C) NO. 861/2018 IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Mathews J. Nedumpara And Others PETITIONERS Versus The Supreme Court of India and Others RESPONDENTS TO THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA AND HIS COMPANION JUDGES OF THEHON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA HUMBLE SUGGESTIONS BY THE PETITIONERS ABOVENAMED MOST RESPECTFULLY SHEWETH: The Audio-Video Recording of Judicial Proceedings is a measure which is very safe and easy to implement, as the Petitioners had directly witnessed the same in a Contempt of Court Proceedings at the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court, as Counsels, where it was implemented on mere application of the Contemnor without calling for any suggestions....

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

“Ratio” of the judges 2 and the NJAC cases

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

“RATIO” OF THE JUDGES 2 AND THE NJAC CASES -Mathews J. Nedumpara The Supreme Court in Keshavanada Bharati held that the “basic structure” of the constitution is inviolable though fundamental rights could be violated. In Indira Nehru Gandhi and Minerva Mills it was held that from 24.04.1973, the validity of a statute has to be tested on the Basic Structure. Independence of Judiciary is one of the Basic features of the constitution. The independence of the judiciary is not about the independent discharge of the functions of a judge subsequent to his appointment but is all about the very appointment, i.e., who...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Recall Application of order and Notice To J.Karnan(08.02.2017)(FIled)

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2017 (DIARY NO.___________/2017) IN SUO MOTU CONMT.PET.(C)NO.1 OF 2017 Justice C.S. Karnan … Applicant/ Alleged Contemnor IN THE MATTER OF Supreme Court of India on its own motion … Suo Moto Versus Justice C.S. Karnan … Original Alleged Contemnor/Respondent APPLICATION SEEKING RECALL OF ORDERS DATED 08/02/2107 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT CULMINATING IN THE ORDER DATED 9TH MAY, 2017 CONVICTING THE APPLICANT FOR CRIMINAL CONTEMPT OF COURT AND SENTENCING HIM TO UNDERGO IMPRISONMENT FOR SIX MONTHS, PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER THROUGH HIS COUNSEL. TO THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HIS COMPANION JUSTICES OF THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Voice of the people

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Flat No. 1, 3rd Floor, Mitra Kunj, 16, Pedder Road, Mumbai 400 026. 18th July, 2019 1) Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi. 2) Hon'ble Shri Justice Pradeep Nandrajog, Chief Justice, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Mumbai-400 032. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR LORDSHIPS: 1. We, common people, activists and lawyers, are constrained to address Your Lordships since despite it being repeatedly brought to the notice of the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India (CJI) and the Hon'ble Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, the most condemnable manner in which the power of contempt of Court is...

Disclaimer: