17 August

Sticky

Explanation to the defects notified in Mathews J. Nedumpara v. Supreme Court of India (Diary no. 40429/2025)

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA Advocate 101, Gundecha Chambers, Nagindas Master Rd, Kala Ghoda, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400001 Mob: +91 98205 35428/ 99679 69256/ 94471 65650/ mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com 25.7.2025 To, The Registrar, Supreme Court of India Sub: Explanation to the defects notified in Mathews J. Nedumpara v. Supreme Court of India (Diary no. 40429/2025) *Objection 9: Clarify as to whether the petition or PIL. If writ, locus to be clarified*. The principal prayer sought for in the writ petition is a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the police/authorities to register an FIR which they are dutybound to do as per Section 173 of BNSS. In Lalita Kumari’s case the Supreme Court...

17 August

0 Comments

Sticky

Abolition of Senior Designation: Open letter to the Prime Minister and other constitutional functionaries.

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

NATIONAL LAWYERS’ CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY AND REFORMS 101, Gundecha Chambers, Nagindas Master Rd, Kala Ghoda, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400001 Mob: +91 98205 35428/9447165650 E-mail: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com nationallawyerscampaign@gmail.com 31.10.2023 To, 1. Hon’ble Shri Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India 2. Hon’ble Shri Arjun Ram Meghwal, Law Minister 3. Hon’ble Shri Mallikarjun Kharge, President of the Indian National Congress (Also, to the leaders of the various political parties, Chief Ministers, Members of Parliament, members of the legal fraternity, press and the public at large) May it please your Excellencies, Sub: Repeal of Section 16 and 23(5) of the Advocates Act, 1961 Ref: Judgement of the Supreme Court in Mathews J. Nedumpara and ors. v. Union of India and...

17 August

0 Comments

Sticky

Ill- treatment of lawyers and litigants, Complainant to CJ of Bombay High Court/CJI

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA 101,Gundecha Chamber, Nagindas Master Road, fort, Mumbai – 400 001. Email id: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com nedumparaassociates@gmail.com Contact No. 9820535428 ================================================================================= To, 10.08.2023 Hon’ble Justice Shri Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Chief Justice of High Court Bombay, Mumbai Also, to, Hon’ble Justice Shri D.Y. Chandrachud Chief Justice of India New Delhi May it please your Lordships, Sub: Ill-treatment of lawyers, the need to bring in a mechanism to redress the grievances of the lawyers and litigants. 1. I have written a large number of letters to the Chief Justices of India and the Chief Justices of the High Court of Bombay, so too, even the excellencies the President of India, the Prime Ministers, Law Ministers, about the...

17 August

0 Comments

Sticky

APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN THE ABOVE-MENTIONED WRIT PETITION FILED BEFORE THIS HON’BLE COURT AS PARTY IN PERSONS I.A. NO. OF 2025

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Click Below To Download The Article YASHWANT VERMA FINAL FILED 3 WRIT SCAN 25.07.2025...

17 August

0 Comments

Sticky

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.706 OF 2025

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Click On The Link Below To Download The Article Mathews J. Nedumpara v. UOI - Yashwant Varma J. Burnt Cash Scam Judgement dt. 07.08.2025...

17 August

0 Comments

Sticky

An Appeal to Members of the Bar and the Litigant Public on the 79th Independence Day

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Mathews J. Nedumpara President National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms 98205 35428 15th August 2025 An Appeal to Members of the Bar and the Litigant Public on the 79th Independence Day (1) Our political executive and legislature are primarily responsible for the ills plaguing our justice delivery system today. It is not that they have acted wrongly, but rather that their persistent inaction has caused this decline. In a democracy, governance is the exclusive province of the legislature and the executive, yet they have allowed the courts to usurp their role. (2) The future Parliaments—whom the Constituent Assembly once regarded with reverence as being truly...

20 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Rule of law must prevail:Nedumpara’s Third petition in SC seeks FIR against Justice Varma (Part 1)

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2025 (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) IN THE MATTER OF: MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA & ORS. PETITIONERS VERSUS THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH I.A. NO. OF 2025 APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN THE ABOVE-MENTIONED WRIT PETITION FILED BEFORE THIS HON’BLE COURT AS PARTY IN PERSONS PAPER BOOK (KINDLY SEE INDEX INSIDE) MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA & 3 ORS.: PARTY-IN-PERSONS MOB. NO. +91 9820535428 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS S.NO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PAGE NO. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. INDEX S. No. Particulars of Documents Page No. of part to which it belongs Remarks Part I [Contents of Paper Book] Part-II [Contents of file alone. [i] [ii] [iii]...

14 July

0 Comments

Sticky

“Good men must not obey the law too well” – video recording of court proceedings and its circulation

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Mathews J. Nedumpara 98205 35428 17.03.2025. The Kerala High Court took objection to our recording of the proceedings and sharing of the same. Though not done by me personally, I have no hesitation to take responsibility. Several MSMEs perturbed by the unfortunate fact that the Courts have been denying them the benefit of the notification which has received the assent of both houses of the Parliament which prohibits recovery action except with the permission of the committee, record the VC proceedings, at the various forums, High Court, Supreme Court etc. 2. Quite recently I defended the cause of an MSME before the Kerala High...

14 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Where a statute provides for an appeal against an interim order, is it open to a litigant to choose at his sweet will, a variation at the hands of the court of first instance or to opt for an appeal? Does the doctrine of res judicata have any application

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

(Excerts from an affidavit drafted by Sri. Nedumpara) 1. This Court by its order dated 21.12.2021 was pleased to protect me from dispossession, but subject to the condition that I pay an amount of Rs. 25 lakhs. Had this Court had the benefit of hearing my lawyer, I bonafide believe, that this Court would have protected me without conditions. I sought my counsel’s advice. He told me that I can seek correction of the order before this Court (single bench) itself, or prefer an appeal under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act, which provides for an appeal even against...

14 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Judicial Reforms: Is the hope in Chief Justice Chandrachud waning?

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Mathews J Nedumpara 26.01.2024. 98205 35428 Judicial Reforms: Is the hope in Chief Justice Chandrachud waning? While some say that their hope in Justice DY Chandrachud, in bringing about judicial Reforms has been waning, I still remain hopeful. There are areas where I differ in opinion from Justice Chandrachud, but when compared to those areas where we are on the same page, the former pales. Many of my fellow lawyers, particularly those who hail from rural areas and who belong to SC/ST and have had their early education in the vernacular language, had expected sweeping changes during Justice Chandrachud’s tenure as Cheif Justice. 14...

Disclaimer: