Why Justice Krishna Iyer said “Contempt power cipherises its user

Mathews J. Nedumpara 8.2.2023 1. What prompts me to pen these lines are the news reports that the Kerala High Court has initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Shri K.M Shahjahan, Private Secretary to Shri V.S Achuthanandan, the former Chief Minister of Kerala. Shri K.M Shahjahan has reportedly alleged that it was not merely, Adv Saiby, the President of the Kerala High Court Advocate Association who was involved in the scandal of bribe for favorable orders in the Kerala High Court, but even the judges themselves. This seems like nothing more than stating the obvious when there exists an allegation of corruption....

Continue reading

When a matter is part heard, to take precipitatory action is nothing short of contempt of court

MATHEWS NEDUMPARA ADVOCATES 101,Gundecha Chamber, Nagindas Master Road, fort, Mumbai – 400 001. Email id: nedumparaassociates@gmail.com Contact No. 9447165650/9820535428 ===================================================================================== To, 12.09.2025 1. Raval Shah & Co. Advocate for ICICI Bank Building no. 5-7, Rajabahadur Mansion, Homi Modi street, fort, Mumbai – 400 023. 2. Yahya Batatawala Advocate for IRP Office no. 311, 3rd Floor, Jolly Bhavan No. 1, Vitthaldas, Thackersay Marg, New Marine Lines, Mumbai – 400 020. 3. Gaurang Chhotalal Shah, Resolution Professional, Flat No. 204, A Wing, Raj Vaibhav 1 Chs, Dhankar Wadi, Mahavir Nagar, Kandivali (w), Mumbai – 400 067 also at: 1221, Maker Chambers V, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021. 4. Shri. Sunil Waghmare, Senior Inspector of Police, Rabale Police Station, Thane-Belapur Road,...

Continue reading

An order pronounced in open court cannot be altered except in an open court hearing

Speaking to the minutes of the order dated 3rd September, 2025, conducted through VC 1. The popular concept among litigants, lawyers and even judges is that what constitutes an order or judgment which binds the party before the court is the order which is signed by the judge and authenticated and made available to the litigant and the public at large, by means of certified copies or as uploaded on the website. However, this is an unfortunate misconception which has calamitous consequences. Instant is the classic example. 2. The bench consisting of their lordships MS Karnik and NR Borkar in their lordships’...

Continue reading

Why the basic structure is a fraud on the constitution – explained in a few words 

Mathews j nedumpara 98205 35428 14th September 2025   I am often asked why I call the "basic structure" a laughable theory. I can answer this in a few words by citing an example. If one were to invoke Article 32 prior to Kesavananda Bharati, the judges would unfailingly ask "why are you here? And which fundamental right of yours is infringed?"   No one would dare approach the Supreme Court without recourse to any other Court unless there is a grave violation of the fundamental rights, wholly justifying the invocation of the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.   After Kesavananda Bharati, however, "public spirited" persons with...

Continue reading

Those Who Opposed NJAC Have No Moral Right to Criticize the Appointment of Justice Pancholi or CJI Gavai’s Nephew.

Mathews J Nedumpara. 98205 35428. 29th August 2025.   (1) The judiciary is one of the most revered institutions of our democracy. But reverence must not be mistaken for immunity from scrutiny. Judicial power, like any other form of public power, must be exercised transparently, accountably, and in the service of the people.   (2) We should long ago have established a system for the selection and appointment of judges akin to that of the IAS, IPS, and other public services—through an open, competitive, and merit-based mechanism. Had such a system been in place, our higher judiciary would have been manned by men and women of...

Continue reading

Writ Petition No. 4777 of 2025 – Seeking Livestreaming and Preservation of Video Records of Court Proceedings to End the Ill-treatment of Lawyers and Litigants. Title

*Mathews J Nedumpara* 98205 35428 30th April 2025. 9.50am *Live streaming of the proceedings of the Bombay High Court* "Publicity is the very soul of justice, it is the keenest spur to exertion and the surest of all guards against improbity. It keeps the judge himself, while trying, under trial - where there is no publicity, there is no justice" - Bentham My petition seeking livestreaming of the proceedings of the Bombay High Court ,so too, of the courts subordinate to it is listed as Serial no. 5 for hearing before the CJ of the Bombay High Court, today. Litigants suffer injustice often without any remedy...

Continue reading

Those Who Opposed NJAC Have No Moral Right to Criticize the Appointment of Justice Pancholi or CJI Gavai’s Nephew.

Mathews J Nedumpara. 98205 35428. 29th August 2025.   (1) The judiciary is one of the most revered institutions of our democracy. But reverence must not be mistaken for immunity from scrutiny. Judicial power, like any other form of public power, must be exercised transparently, accountably, and in the service of the people.   (2) We should long ago have established a system for the selection and appointment of judges akin to that of the IAS, IPS, and other public services—through an open, competitive, and merit-based mechanism. Had such a system been in place, our higher judiciary would have been manned by men and women of...

Continue reading

Writ Petition No. 4777 of 2025 – Seeking Livestreaming and Preservation of Video Records of Court Proceedings to End the Ill-treatment of Lawyers and Litigants

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2025 (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) IN THE MATTER OF: MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA & ORS. PETITIONERS VERSUS THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH   I.A. NO. OF 2025 APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE THE MATTER AS PARTY IN PERSONS   PAPER BOOK (KINDLY SEE INDEX INSIDE) MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA & 3 ORS.: PARTY-IN-PERSONS MOB. NO. +91 9820535428 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS S.NO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PAGE NO. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. INDEX S. No. Particulars of Documents Page No. of part to which it belongs Remarks Part I [Contents of Paper Book] Part-II [Contents of file alone. [i] [ii] [iii] [iv] [v] E-Court Fee 1 Listing Performa. ‘A1-A3’ `A-A1’ 2 Cover...

Continue reading

Disclaimer:


The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to our firm of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation or advertisement by us. The contents of this website is intended purely for educational and informational purposes and should not be construed as soliciting, advertisement or as legal advice.


The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Nedumpara & Nedumpara. No material on this site may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted or distributed in any way without the prior written permission of Nedumpara & Nedumpara.