Nedumpara

Abolition of Senior Designation: Open letter to the Prime Minister and other constitutional functionaries.

NATIONAL LAWYERS’ CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY AND REFORMS 101, Gundecha Chambers, Nagindas Master Rd, Kala Ghoda, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400001 Mob: +91 98205 35428/9447165650 E-mail: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com nationallawyerscampaign@gmail.com 31.10.2023 To, 1. Hon’ble Shri Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India 2. Hon’ble Shri Arjun Ram Meghwal, Law Minister 3. Hon’ble Shri Mallikarjun Kharge, President of the Indian […]

Ill- treatment of lawyers and litigants, Complainant to CJ of Bombay High Court/CJI

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA 101,Gundecha Chamber, Nagindas Master Road, fort, Mumbai – 400 001. Email id: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com nedumparaassociates@gmail.com Contact No. 9820535428 ================================================================================= To, 10.08.2023 Hon’ble Justice Shri Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Chief Justice of High Court Bombay, Mumbai Also, to, Hon’ble Justice Shri D.Y. Chandrachud Chief Justice of India New Delhi May it please your Lordships, Sub: […]

An Appeal to Members of the Bar and the Litigant Public on the 79th Independence Day

Mathews J. Nedumpara President National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms 98205 35428 15th August 2025   An Appeal to Members of the Bar and the Litigant Public on the 79th Independence Day   (1) Our political executive and legislature are primarily responsible for the ills plaguing our justice delivery system today. It is […]

Where a statute provides for an appeal against an interim order, is it open to a litigant to choose at his sweet will, a variation at the hands of the court of first instance or to opt for an appeal? Does the doctrine of res judicata have any application

(Excerts from an affidavit drafted by Sri. Nedumpara) 1. This Court by its order dated 21.12.2021 was pleased to protect me from dispossession, but subject to the condition that I pay an amount of Rs. 25 lakhs. Had this Court had the benefit of hearing my lawyer, I bonafide believe, that this Court would have […]

Wholly avoidable hurdles created by the department of the registry of the High Court dealing with the writ jurisdiction (civil) – Request for intervention.

Mathews J Nedumpara President National Lawyers Campaign For Judicial Transparency and Reforms, NLC 98205 35428 09.02.2024 To, Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. V. Gangapurwala The Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicature at Madras May it please your Lordship, Sub: Wholly avoidable hurdles created by the department of the registry of the High Court dealing […]

The Supreme Court ought to hear SLPs concerning the very lives, liberties and properties of the citizens of this country and adjudicate real lis, rather than spending all its time on matters falling in the exclusive province of the legislature and executive, such as demonitisation, NJAC, CEC, Article 370, etc. – A critical analysis of the functioning of the Supreme Court of India.

Mathews J. Nedumpara 6.9.2023 1. In the Supreme Court of India, on an average 60,000 Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) are filed under Article 136 of the Constitution. Any person aggrieved by any judgment, decree, determination, sentence or order of any court or tribunal, can seek the leave to appeal. For instance, a person aggrieved by […]