14 July

Sticky

HAVE ARTICLES 226 AND 32 LED TO DENIAL OF JUSTICE. WILL REPEAL OF IT LEAD TO INJUSTICE?

Adv. Mathews J. Nedumpara 9820535428 Ambedkar described Article 32 as the very heart and soul of the Constitution. Our founding fathers, many of whom were victims of illegal arrest and confinement, being part of the freedom struggle, incorporated in our constitution, Part III, fundamental rights. By virtue of Article 32 of the Constitution a citizen can approach the Supreme court for the enforcement of his/her fundamental rights and that very right to access the Supreme Court itself was declared to be a fundamental right. It is almost 70 years since the Constitution came into existence. I as a lawyer being in the...

14 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Rejection of W.P (diary) no. 41768 of 2024 instituted by my humble self and 9 other citizens, lawyers and litigants, in challenge of the order dated 24.4.2024 of the Registrar, Judicial, dismissing W.P no. 1005 of 2022 seeking the abolition of the collegium and seeking restoration of the NJAC, an open, transparent, competitive, merit-based selection of the judges of the High Courts and Supreme Court, by de-registering the same. Complaint – reg.

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Open Letters

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA Advocate 101, Gundecha Chambers, Nagindas Master Rd, Kala Ghoda, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400001 Mob: +91 98205 35428/99679 69256 E-mail: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com 5th October, 2024 OPEN LETTER Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. D.Y Chandrachud Chief Justice of India May it please your Lordship, Sub: Rejection of W.P (diary) no. 41768 of 2024 instituted by my humble self and 9 other citizens, lawyers and litigants, in challenge of the order dated 24.4.2024 of the Registrar, Judicial, dismissing W.P no. 1005 of 2022 seeking the abolition of the collegium and seeking restoration of the NJAC, an open, transparent, competitive, merit-based selection of the judges of the High Courts and Supreme Court, by...

14 July

0 Comments

Sticky

To declare that the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is unconstitutional and void, or at least Sections 2(c)(i), 14, 16 and 17(5) thereof

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Sub: To declare that the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is unconstitutional and void, or at least Sections 2(c)(i), 14, 16 and 17(5) thereof IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN ITS EXTRA-ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION W. P.(C) NO. 14564OF 2016 Mathews J. Nedumpara … Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. … Respondents MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Counsel for the Petitioner P.BIJIMON (B-732) (K/3173/1999) JACOB SAMUEL (J-1316) (K/259/1997 Room No.210, 2nd Floor, Prasanna Vihar Appartments, Near High Court of Kerala, Cochin-682 031 Ph.No.0484-2368737 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN ITS EXTRA-ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION W. P.(C) NO. 14564OF 2016 Mathews J. Nedumpara … Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors....

14 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Usurpation of executive and legislative powers by the Supreme Court and High Courts has put the concept of constitutional democracy in India to grave jeopardy.

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in blog|press

CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW TO KNOW MORE https://x.com/NedumparaJ/status/1850048766839038442?t=gIF_yzEaGsa3jFuYJw0Jqg&s=08 The usurpation of executive and legislative powers by the Supreme Court and High Courts has put the concept of constitutional democracy in India in grave jeopardy...

14 July

0 Comments

Sticky

The painful and wholly avoidable hardship and injustice caused to the litigant public by the unfortunate manner in which the affairs of the Court are conducted during the vacations.

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Open Letters

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA Advocate 101, Gundecha Chamber, Nagindas Master Road, Fort, Mumbai- 400 001 e-mail: nedumparaassociates@gmail.com Mob no.:9820535428/ 9920398035 31st October, 2024 OPEN LETTER To, Hon’ble Shri Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicature At Bombay May it please your Lordship, Sub: The painful and wholly avoidable hardship and injustice caused to the litigant public by the unfortunate manner in which the affairs of the Court are conducted during the vacations. 1. My humble Self, as a Lawyer primarily practicing in the High Court of Bombay, one who by sheer accident happened to come as an outstation Lawyer, has been watching with a sense of despair and helplessness,...

14 July

0 Comments

Sticky

What makes me quite uncomfortable about the elevation of Justice Sanjeev Khanna as CJI is that he along with Justice Arun Misra sat on a Saturday to be a part of a bench headed by Justice Gogoi and declared that the complaint against Justice Gogoi by the female staff constitutes to be the “gravest of threat to the independence of judiciary

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Open Letters

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/66031978/ Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 30.10.2024. What makes me quite uncomfortable about the elevation of Justice Sanjeev Khanna as CJI is that he along with Justice Arun Misra sat on a Saturday to be a part of a bench headed by Justice Gogoi and declared that the complaint against Justice Gogoi by the female staff constitutes to be the "gravest of threat to the independence of judiciary"...

14 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Letter to the Prime Minister and others forewarning them the hearing of the NJAC case is a mockery and the outcome is a fait accompli, that urgent remedial steps be taken to avert a fraud on the constitution.

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA Senior Partner NEDUMPARA & NEDUMPARA Law Firm 304, Hari Chambers, 3rd Floor, 58-64, S.B.S Road, Fort, Mumbai-23 Mob: +91 9820535428 E-mail: nedumpara2004@yahoo.com, nedumpara2004@hotmail.com Date:24th March, 2015 1) His Excellency Shri Pranab Mukherjee, President of India, Also to 2) His Excellency Shri H.M. Ansari, Vice-President of India, 3) Hon'ble Shri Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India, 4) Hon'ble Shri H.L. Dattu, Chief Justice of India, 5) Hon'ble Shri D.V. Sadananda Gowda, Minister for Law & Justice 6) Hon'ble Smt. Sumitra Mahajan, Speaker, Lok Sabha, 7) Hon'ble Judges of the Supreme Court, Supreme Court of India, MAY IT PLEASE YOUR EXCELLENCIES/LORDSHIPS/MADAM/SIRS, The instant is a letter which has no parallel in the annals of history. The author of this...

14 July

0 Comments

Sticky

JUDICIAL IMMUNITY/TORTIOUS LIABILITY

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 23.06.2024. JUDICIAL IMMUNITY/TORTIOUS LIABILITY “Rex non potest peccare”, namely that the king can do no wrong, is a fundamental principle of law. Stated in simple terms, the king is not liable for any action of his agents and servants. This concept, over the centuries, was much diluted with many an exception being accepted. Today, except judicial function, the king, namely, the sovereign, is liable for the tortious action of his delegate/trustee/servant. The sovereign immunity is not absolutely available even against the armed forces. The concept of absolute immunity which the judges of the superior courts in India enjoy and assert...

14 July

0 Comments

Sticky

No recovery against MSMEs without attempt at revival as provided by law.

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Mathews J. Nedumpara 98205 35428 11.09.2024. Economists believe that in a decade or two India is going to be the world’s third largest economy. Our country, once starved for foreign exchange, now probably attracts more foreign exchange than any other country. The reason is the demographic advantage we have. Most of the developed world, Europe, Japan, China, are aging. We are the youngest country in the world in the sense that 60% of the population is within the ages of 20 to 60, the work force. However, many economists are not as optimistic as others. The reason is that the majority of the population...

14 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Kinship Chart of the judges of the Supreme Court of India

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 5.02.2025 Kinship Chart of the judges of the Supreme Court of India The preparation of the chart has been no mean task, for no official data is available. The data has been collected from members of the bar across the country who volunteered information. The chart is not complete. It may also contain certain inaccuracies. However, for all practical purpose the chart does paint complete picture of the nepotism and favoritism in the appointment of judges and the designation of lawyers as senior advocates. The data above would undoubtedly show that there can hardly be a case where the...

Disclaimer: