26 February

Sticky

Nedumpara’s letter to the Prime Minister demanding emergent judicial reforms to prevent democracy be reduced to judgeocracy

5.9.2020AN OPEN LETTERMATHEWS J. NEDUMPARAPresidentNATIONAL LAWYERS CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIALTRANSPARENCY AND REFORMS304, Hari Chambers, 3rd Floor, 58-64, S.B.S. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400 023No. 11, DD Tudor Villa, Padam Road, Vaduthala- 682 023Mob: +91 9820535428 email: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com To, Hon'ble Shri. Narendra Modi,The Prime Minister of India. Hon'ble Smt. Sonia Gandhi,President of INC. Leaders of the various political parties,Members of Parliament, Members of the legal fraternity,press, the public at large. Hon'ble Sirs and Mesdames, Sub: Emergent judicial reforms lest supremacy of the Constitution and the Parliament, nay, democracy should be put to great jeopardy, and “judgeocracy” is further perpetuated through PILs. The conviction of Mr. Prashant Bhushan for contempt of court...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

The Judgement in Sabarimala Case Constitutes to be No Res Judicata and Is Not Executable

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

The Judgement in Sabarimala Case Constitutes to be No Res Judicata and Is Not Executable. Mathews J. Nedumpara 16th November, 2019 What prompts me to pen these few lines is the news item in today’s (16.11.2019) Times of India, Cochin Edition, under the caption “Government must read dissenting ruling in Sabarimala case: Nariman. Cannot allow violation of extremely important ruling: Judge”. Francis Bacon, Lord Chancellor of England, said de fide et officio judicis non recipitur quaestio; sed de scientia, sive error sit juris sive facti – the honesty and integrity of a Judge cannot be questioned, but his...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Review of the judgement of the 9 judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court in Judges 2 case in 1993

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Review of the judgement of the 9 judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court in Judges 2 case in 1993 The judges 2 case is of monumental significance so far as our very existence as a constitutional democracy is concerned. For those like my daughter, a young lawyer, my juniors and the thousands of young lawyers who dream of one day occupying the august office of the Chief Justice of India or a of a Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court, everything depends upon the decision of the court in the review. I say so because, today,...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Who is responsible for demolition of Maradu homes – an injustice which has no parallel in history

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Mathews J. Nedumpara Keralites across the breadth and width of the globe, nay, millions of people, with bated breath, watched five apartment buildings in Maradu, a prime location of Cochin surrounded by lakes and lush green, crumble down with a mushroom of dust being formed, as if an atom bomb has been dropped. While a few sadists, insane minds, knowing not what the ramifications are, celebrated, clapping their hands and beating drums, millions all...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Demolition of Maradu homes, who will tell the court that it went wrong?

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Mathews J. Nedumpara I pen these few lines with great amount of pain and anguish. The Government of Kerala, in furtherance of an all party meeting convened by Shri Pinarayi Vijayan, Chief Minister of Kerala, engaged Shri Harish Salve, probably the highest paid lawyer in the country, to save 450 odd families of their homes, which were ordered to be demolished by a Bench of the Supreme Court headed by Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun Misra....

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Simple solution for reducing pendency of cases is to do away with “precedents” nay, repeal of Article 141 of the Constitution

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Simple solution for reducing pendency of cases is to doaway with “precedents” nay, repeal of Article 141 of theConstitution.Mathews J. Nedumpara “Simple things can be done in simple ways;Hard things too can be done in simple ways;But it requires an inventive brainAnd can be done without much strain” The above words of a poet, I believe, should be the guiding lamp when we think of judicial reforms. There are two streams of administration of justice, one, the civil law system followed in the European continent and the Latin America, and the other the common law system followed in UK, India, America and...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Nedumpara’s Letter To The Prime Minister Complaining Nepotism In Judges’ Appointment

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Mathews J NedumparaPresident , NLCOPEN LETTER04.06.2020 Hon'ble Shri. Narendra ModiPrime Minister of IndiaNew DelhiHon'ble Shri S A Bobde,Chief Justice of India.Hon'ble the Chief Justice of Rajasthan.Hon'ble Shri Ashok Galot,Chief Minister of Rajasthan. Sirs, Sub: The reported decision of the collegium of the Rajasthan High Court recommending 17 names for appointment as judges of the Rajasthan High Court. I address this letter with great amount of pain and agony. I wish i were not to address this letter. But I have no choice. As the President of the National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms, an organization registered under the Maharashtra Public Charitable Trust...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Sabarimala case

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Open Letters

SABARIMALA CASEParturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus-Mathews J Nedumpara9.2.2020 The National Ayyappa Devotees’ Association (NADA) was the first entity to challenge the judgment of the Five-Judge Constitution Bench in WP No. 373/2006 (the Sabarimala case) holding that Rule 3(b) of the Kerala Places of Public Worship (Authorization of Entry) Rules, 1965, which restricts women of menstruating age from entering the shrine of Lord Ayyappa at Sabarimala, as unconstitutional. The Review Petition filed by it was the second of the large number of Review Petitions seeking review of the judgment in the Sabarimala case. In the petition instituted under Article 32, the NADA...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Ten myths of Indian Constitutional Law

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

TEN MYTHS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-Mathews J. NedumparaIntroductionIn the NLC’s (National Lawyer’s Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms) agenda, open selection of judges of High Courts and the Supreme Court by notification of vacancies and invitation and application of all eligibles, so too, references from all stake holders, finds the very first place. The reason is, simple, obvious; because the higher judiciary in India, today, is perceived to be a dynasty, not very different from that of the political parties, a phenomenon which is antithetical to the very concept of a constitutional democracy which guarantees not merely equality before law...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Criticizing Bar Council amounts to misconduct

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

27.06.2021 "Criticizing Bar Council amounts to misconduct"? Every man has a right to his reputation and nobody has a right to violate it. This is undeniable and has been recognized from the early days of Roman law, all legal systems. Advocates, and for that matter even the judges have no right to violate the right of reputation. When the common people violate it, they will have to face the consequence of criminal and civil proceedings for defamation and even contempt. Lawyers certainly are not above law. But at the same time, any attempt to silence criticism and dissent in the name of...

Disclaimer: