Petitions
Contempt of Court is a cathartic jurisdiction which belongs to the dark ages. Contrary to the elementary principles of jurisprudence, in Contempt of Court, the accuser and the adjudicator is the court itself. In civil law countries, there is no Contempt of Court jurisprudence. Contempt of Court by scandalisation became obsolete even in England by the end of the 19th century. Unfortunately, our founding fathers allowed the concept of Contempt of Court to continue in free India. It is high time we erased the draconian law of contempt from our statutes, and in particular, Contempt of Court by scandalisation. Read my Writ Petition of 2016 challenging the constitutional validity of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Sub: To declare that the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is unconstitutional and void, or at least Sections 2(c)(i), 14, 16 and 17(5) thereof IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN ITS EXTRA-ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION W. P.(C) NO. 14564OF 2016 Mathews J. Nedumpara … Petitioner Union of India & Ors. … Respondents MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226
The Bench headed by Justice Dipankar Datta dismissed my Writ Petition under Article 32 seeking registration of an FIR and a just and fair investigation into the incident of huge volumes of burnt cash found at the residence of Justice Yashwant Varma, on the ground that I had not produced, along with the writ petition, my representation seeking investigation, which indeed was produced as Ann. P5 at page 118 of the writ petition. I filed an Application for Review on 16.8.2025. The same is yet to be heard. All review petitions are dismissed in Chambers without any hearing, entirely behind the back of the parties.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIAINHERENT JURISDICTIONREVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2025INWRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 706 OF 2025 (Against the final impugned judgment dated 07.08.2025 passed by this Hon’ble Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 706 of 2025) IN THE MATTER OF:MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA & ORS. PETITIONERSVERSUSTHE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENTSWITHI.A. NO. OF 2025APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO
Application for open court hearing.
DraftSCI Mathews J Nedumpara and othersVs.Supreme Court of India and others Review Petition( Justice varma) Application for open court hearing. How this Court deals with the complaints of corruption or other misdemeanor involving members of higher judiciary is a question which the Petitioners, nay, the people of this country, watched with bated breath to be answered when the incident of
To declare that the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is unconstitutional and void, or at least Sections 2(c)(i), 14, 16 and 17(5) thereof
CLICK BELOW TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THE ARTICLE Writ Petition by MJN against Contempt jurisdiction filed before HC Kerala
Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. V. Gangapurwala The Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicature at Madras
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 880 OF 2017 (Against the final impugned judgment dated 15.02.2024 passed by this Hon’ble Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 880 of 2017 along with Writ petitions (Civil) no. 59 of 2018, 975 of 2022 & 1132 of
In the 10yr period between 2011 to 2020
Mathews J Nedumpara98205 35428 In the 10yr period between 2011 to 2020 a)Review petitions (civil) dismissed- 19710Allowed- 92 b) Review Petitions (Crl)Dismissed- 6087Allowed- 48 c) Curative petitions (civil)Dismissed- 2155Allowed- 0 d) Curative petitions (Crl)Dismissed- 620Allowed- 3 So far as curative petitions go, I am not concerned. The curative jurisprudence itself is against the constitution, a judicial legislation, which no court
BEFORE THE HONOROUBLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMW.A. No. of 2024(Against the order dated 23-10-2024 of this Honourable Court in IA No.1/2024 in WP(Civil) No. 30885/2024) M/s. SARK Spice Produce Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.: Appellants/Applicants/Petitioners V/s Reserve Bank of India & Ors.: Respondents/Respondents/Respondents S Y N O P S I SThe 1st petitioner is an MSME enterprise, which had
BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Writ Appeal. No. In of 2024 W.P. (C) No. 41576 of 2023
BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMWrit Appeal No.Inof 2024W.P. (C) No. 41576 of 2023(Against the Judgment dated 24-10-2024 of this Honourable Court in W.P. (C) No. 41576/2023) P.K. KRISHNA KUMAR & ANR : Appellants/PetitionersVs.INDUSIND BANK & ORS : Respondents/Respondents S Y N O P S I S The impugned Judgment suffers from factual and legal errors, apparent
Writ Petition Filed in 2016 Against the Outdated and Barbaric Law of Contempt
Sub: To declare that the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is unconstitutional and void, or at least Sections 2(c)(i), 14, 16 and 17(5) thereof IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN ITS EXTRA-ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION W. P.(C) NO. 14564OF 2016 Mathews J. Nedumpara
Stay Informed with Legal Insights
Get the latest legal news, case studies, and jurisdiction updates delivered to your preferred channel
- SMS