Mathews J Nedumpara

98205 35428

07.08.2025

 

Press release

 

I am shocked to come across the judgement of the Supreme Court dismissing the writ petition

No. 706/2025 instituted by my humble self and a few others on the ground that we did not produce a copy of the representation dated 26.5.2025 to the President of India which we had stated on oath to have been presented by us in terms of the direction of the order of the Supreme Court dated 21.5.2025.

 

In the course of the hearing i indeed asserted that we had made representations to the Prime minister, Home minister, President, namely, the execute and that we did not receive any response on such representation. Going to the police is a futile exercise in view of the judgement in K Veeraswami.

 

The court dismissed the petition observing that we did not make any representation dated 26.5.2025 despite liberty granted by this court on earlier occasion. The said representation was produced in the petition as Annexure P5 at page 118 to 122. The Supreme Court observed in para 11 of rhe judgement that “if indeed any such representation had been made, as claimed, it should have formed part of the writ petition having regard to the decisions of this court in Bharat Singh v State of Haryana”.

To repeat, the representation was part of the writ petition and the observation made by the court is factually incorrect. The order of the Court would amount to a manifest error apparent on the face of record. We will take appropriate legal steps to rectify the mistake to ensure that all citizens are treated as equal before the eyes of law and that no one is exempt from the penal laws of the land. In Justice Varma’s case the registration of an FIR and investigation is absolutely necessary to uphold the rule of law.