26 February

Sticky

Are not collegium a synonym for nepotism?

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE COLLEGIUMMay it please Your Lordships, I have come to know from the social media that the collegium of the Supreme Court of India has recommended Chief Justice Maheswari of the Karnataka High Court and Justice Sanjeev Khanna of the Delhi High court as judges of the Supreme Court. It was further reported that justice Sanjeev Khanna is the son of Justice Khanna and nephew of the legendary Justice HR Khanna who had the courage to hold that the right to life does not stand suspended on a declaration of emergency. Justice Khanna had to pay a...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Are not the eminent lawyers who lament at the misery of migrant labourers ‘ravenous wolves in the clothing of a sheep’?

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

28.5.2020 The miseries which the millions of migrant labourers had to face with the imposition of the lockdown, so too its easing no words can adequately describe. It would wrench the hearts of even the most hardened ones. But the question is: could the governments be entirely blamed for the same even while fully accepting that there has been great shortcomings even in Kerala which has managed the Covid pandemic exceedingly well? But the question is: are not these functions falling under the exclusive province of the executive as has been rightly pointed out by Arghya Sen Gupta in his article...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Nedumpara’s Open Letter To The Hon’ble PM, CJI, Chief Justices Of The High Courts, Members Of Parliament

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

13.3.2021 An Open Letter To The Hon’ble Pm, Cji, Chief Justices Of The High Courts, Members Of Parliament Hon’ble Sirs and Mesdames, When Hon’ble Justice Indu Malhotra was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India, the undersigned, who is only too conscious of his insignificance, had an immense sense of happiness and joy. There is yet another instance where I was extremely jubilant, that was when the NJAC bill was introduced in the Parliament. Mrs. Indu Malhotra’s appointment came shortly after we had addressed a letter asking for greater representation of women in the Supreme Court and High Courts. The...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Review of the judgement of the 9 judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court in Judges 2 case in 1993

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Review of the judgement of the 9 judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court in Judges 2 case in 1993 The judges 2 case is of monumental significance so far as our very existence as a constitutional democracy is concerned. For those like my daughter, a young lawyer, my juniors and the thousands of young lawyers who dream of one day occupying the august office of the Chief Justice of India or a of a Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court, everything depends upon the decision of the court in the review. I say so because, today,...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Nedumpara’s Open Letter to Justice Kurian Joseph

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

3rd December, 2018ToHon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph ,Former Judge, Supreme Court of India,New Delhi.OPEN LETTERMAY IT PLEASE YOUR LORDSHIP: Today’s Times of India, on its front page, carried an article by Mr. Dhananjay Mohapatra, one of the illustrious legal reporters of the country, under the caption “We felt the then CJI was remote-controlled: Joseph”. Within the said main heading, there was a sub-heading titled “Ex Supreme Court Judge says minority tag hinders careers”. Under the said caption Your Lordship is reported to have said “the minority tag is a hindrance to career progression of...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

The Judgement in Sabarimala Case Constitutes to be No Res Judicata and Is Not Executable

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

The Judgement in Sabarimala Case Constitutes to be No Res Judicata and Is Not Executable. Mathews J. Nedumpara 16th November, 2019 What prompts me to pen these few lines is the news item in today’s (16.11.2019) Times of India, Cochin Edition, under the caption “Government must read dissenting ruling in Sabarimala case: Nariman. Cannot allow violation of extremely important ruling: Judge”. Francis Bacon, Lord Chancellor of England, said de fide et officio judicis non recipitur quaestio; sed de scientia, sive error sit juris sive facti – the honesty and integrity of a Judge cannot be questioned, but his...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Are not the civil courts the real ‘constitutional courts’?

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

In the last two decades or so, we have often heard the elite lawyers in Delhi referring to the Supreme Court as constitutional courts which gives the impression to the common man that the Supreme court and High courts are the only courts empowered to interpret the constitution. The question is, in doing so, are they not committing a fraud on the constitution. I have, in my article titled, 'Ten myths of constitutional law', dealt with at some length of the falsehoods which have become gospel truths and to doubt which, is nothing but sacrilege. The foremost of such myth...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Nedumpara’s letter to the Prime Minister demanding emergent judicial reforms to prevent democracy be reduced to judgeocracy

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

5.9.2020AN OPEN LETTERMATHEWS J. NEDUMPARAPresidentNATIONAL LAWYERS CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIALTRANSPARENCY AND REFORMS304, Hari Chambers, 3rd Floor, 58-64, S.B.S. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400 023No. 11, DD Tudor Villa, Padam Road, Vaduthala- 682 023Mob: +91 9820535428 email: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com To, Hon'ble Shri. Narendra Modi,The Prime Minister of India. Hon'ble Smt. Sonia Gandhi,President of INC. Leaders of the various political parties,Members of Parliament, Members of the legal fraternity,press, the public at large. Hon'ble Sirs and Mesdames, Sub: Emergent judicial reforms lest supremacy of the Constitution and the Parliament, nay, democracy should be put to great jeopardy, and “judgeocracy” is further perpetuated through PILs. The conviction of Mr. Prashant Bhushan for contempt of court...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Have Articles 226 and 32 led to denial of Justice. Will repeal of it lead to injustice?

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Have Articles 226 and 32 led to denial of Justice. Will repeal of it lead to injustice? Ambedkar described Article 32 as the very heart and soul of the Constitution. Our founding fathers, many of whom were victims of illegal arrest and confinement, being part of the freedom struggle, incorporated in our constitution, Part III, fundamental rights. By virtue of Article 32 of the Constitution a citizen can approach the Supreme court for the enforcement of his/her fundamental rights and that very right to access the Supreme Court itself was declared to be a fundamental right. It is almost 70 years...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Usurpation of executive and legislative powers by the Indian higher judiciary

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

by Mathews J. Nedumpara The front page of the Times of India dated 1st April 2017, which I have in my hands now, has almost 80% covered by Court news with the caption “Highway liquor vends, bars must close from today: Supreme Court”, being the most prominent heading. On its right “Won’t apologize if work not restored: Justice Karnan to Supreme Court”, followed by another three Court-related news items, including the caption “No early Supreme Court hearing in Ayodhya case”. What is said about 1st of April, 2017 could be true about all Tuesdays and Saturdays, for, on Mondays and Fridays,...

Blogs

Disclaimer: