Blogs

Mathews J. Nedumpara > Blogs (Page 4)

The Founding Fathers, by incorporating Articles 226 and 32, reintroduced the dual system of administration of justice which was abolished in England in 1875, having proved to be counterproductive

The Founding Fathers, by incorporating Articles 226 and 32, reintroduced the dual system of administration of justice which was abolished in England in 1875, having proved to be counterproductive Mathews J Nedumpara Common people, often reassured by news reports where the High Courts under Article 226 and even the Supreme Court under Article 32 come to the rescue of common people who are denied justice by the government and its instrumentalities, are granted instant and hustle free justice institute writ petitions when they face similar injustice. Except for a few High Courts like that of Kerala where relief under the writ jurisdiction is granted...

Continue reading

Don’t dismiss SLPs of common man in ” 93 seconds” to hear PILs of celebrity lawyers for days and weeks, an appeal to the CJI and other judges

Don't dismiss SLPs of common man in " 93 seconds" to hear PILs of celebrity lawyers for days and weeks, an appeal to the CJI and other judges Mathews J Nedumpara 29.08.2023 link here:  Article is From Sep 16, 2023 Court Not Hearing Ordinary Citizens, Lawyer Claims. Chief Justice Responds The Collegium system of judges appointing themselves, mostly their kith and kin, near and dear and the system of judges anointing mostly their kith and kin as Senior Advocates are pernicious practices which have destroyed the institution of judiciary, nay, both a fraud on the Constitution. The Supreme Court has absolutely failed the people of...

Continue reading

Article 141 does not sanctify Judicial Legislation (as a clarification to a query)

Article 141 does not sanctify Judicial Legislation (as a clarification to a query) Mathews J Nedumpara 22.06.2024. I Am not against the doctrine of "stare decisis et non quieta movere", nay, precedents,but only against it being reduced to a great menace,nay, absurdity. The difference between " res judicata" and "stare decisis" is forgotten. That is the real concern. What is done Today in the name of 'precedent' is to make past erroneous decisions which were binding only on the parties to the litigation, binding on all, even the posterity. The authoritativeness of a judgment based on the strength of the bench belongs to province...

Continue reading

Can anyone imagine of a greater injustice than the refusal of the courts and tribunals to extend the benefits of the notification dated 29.5.2015 of the Central Government under Section 9 of the MSMED Act, to the MSMEs?

Can anyone imagine of a greater injustice than the refusal of the courts and tribunals to extend the benefits of the notification dated 29.5.2015 of the Central Government under Section 9 of the MSMED Act, to the MSMEs? Mathews J Nedumpara 26th November 23 The notification was issued in the larger interest of the nation, the Banks and Financial institutions, millions of small entrepreneurs and traders who make the economy of the country sail smoothly, so too millions of workers employed by the MSMEs. MSMEs contribute to the nation building in no mean way. They manufacture goods and provide for services, nay create...

Continue reading

An appeal to the Honourable Chief Justice of India and Companion Judges

An appeal to the Honourable Chief Justice of India and Companion Judges Mathews J Nedumpara 29.08.2023 98205 35428   The current system of judges appointing themselves mostly of their kith and kin, near and dear and of judges anointing mostly their kith and kin as Senior Advocates is a pernicious practice which has destroyed the institution of judiciary, nay, both a fraud on the Constitution. The Supreme Court has absolutely failed the people of this country. It has no time to hear and decide the real cases involving the lives, properties and liberties of the common people. The average time it devote to hear an SLP...

Continue reading

PIL is antithetical to the Principles of natural justice

PIL is antithetical to the Principles of natural justice Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 26th July 2023 The Supreme Court has done great disservice to the nation by allowing Ashwani Upadhyay, Prashant Bhushan and their ilk to file so called PILs on issues which are not justiciable at all for publicity. The judges permitted the forum of the Supreme court to be abused because PILs allowed them to usurp matters falling in the exclusive province of the executive and legislature and rule the country, particularly on populist issues which make such abuse difficult to be criticized. I whole heartedly welcome people taking up the cases...

Continue reading

The need to bring an end to the out of turn hearing of cases of only the rich, powerful and the elite represented by “senior advocates” at the cost and detriment of the less privileged involving enforcement of valuable constitutional and legal rights – reg.

The need to bring an end to the out of turn hearing of cases of only the rich, powerful and the elite represented by "senior advocates" at the cost and detriment of the less privileged involving enforcement of valuable constitutional and legal rights - reg. Mathews J Nedumpara 24th July 2023 Hon'ble Shri Nitin Jamdar Acting Chief Justice, High Court of Bombay May it please your Lordship, This is the lastest in a long chain of letters which i have addressed to the Chief Justices/Acting CJs, ever since I happened to enter the portals of the Bombay High Court 15 years ago, as a total stranger,...

Continue reading

Abolish Senior Designation

Abolish Senior Designation Mathews J Nedumpara President, NLC 28.02.2023   It is hearting to note that a large number of my esteemed brothers and sisters from the legal fraternity have joined this Group being determined to fight against the senior advocate designation system which was not in existence in this country until 1966. Unless and until this discriminatory and unjust system is not abolished, the legal system of our country has no future at all. In fact, what is at an even greater stake is the very institution of our Judiciary. Only a few people in our nation realize the great risk the country faces...

Continue reading

SAVE US FROM ‘COURTOASTROPHY’ PRAY HOME BUYERS IN COCHIN

a

  SAVE US FROM ‘COURTOASTROPHY’ PRAY HOME BUYERS IN COCHIN Mathews J Nedumpara In his book titled “Off the Bench” in Chapter under the caption “Justices and justicing”, legendary Justice Krishna Iyer had lamented about the plight of millions of slum dwellers, who prayed ‘Save us from the Courts’, whose shanties within the precincts of Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Mumbai, were bulldozed in execution of an order of the Bombay High Court in a PIL on the premise that they were illegal. I was woken up from my sleep on the morning of 8th of May 2019 by an old client saying...

Continue reading

If the king (sovereign) is below God and the law, the judges and the depositories of the judicial power of the sovereign are not above God and law

a

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta,Chief justice,High Court of Judicature at Bombay. May it please your Lordship, I logged in to the Chief Justice's Court even before 11 am this morning and sat all throughout, waiting to be admitted, inspite of the unbearable pain due to slipped disc. I send a screenshot via whatsapp to Shri Chandwani, Prothonotory, and Shri Nikumb, your lordship’s associate, pointing out that I have not been admitted and requesting them to admit me, since my case, Sr. No. 29, a petition instituted by a designated covid hospital seeking immediate oxygen supply. I do not wish to attribute any...

Continue reading

Disclaimer:


The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to our firm of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation or advertisement by us. The contents of this website is intended purely for educational and informational purposes and should not be construed as soliciting, advertisement or as legal advice.


The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Nedumpara & Nedumpara. No material on this site may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted or distributed in any way without the prior written permission of Nedumpara & Nedumpara.