26 February

Sticky

National Lawyers Campaign For Judicial Transparency & Reforms

Mobile: +91 98205 35428 E. Mail: nationallawyerscampaign@gmail.com 3rd December, 2018 To Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph , Former Judge, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi. OPEN LETTER MAY IT PLEASE YOUR LORDSHIP: Todays Times of India, on its front page, carried an article by Mr. Dhananjay Mohapatra, one of the illustrious legal reporters of the country, under the caption We felt the then CJI was remote-controlled: Joseph. Within the said main heading, there was a sub-heading titled Ex Supreme Court Judge says minority tag hinders careers. Under the said caption Your Lordship is reported to have said the minority tag is a hindrance to career progression of members of...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Justice Karnans application for Remission to H.E.The President of India(A4)

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA Advocate 304, Hari Chambers, 3rd Floor, 58-64, S.B.S. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400 023 Ph: +91 98205 35428(M), 02222626634, 04842368737, 02222626432,01122146145 E-mail: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com To His Excellency Shri. Ram Nath Kovind, President of India, Rashtrapati Bhavan, Raisina Hill, New Delhi,110 004. Sub. : Memorandum/Representation under Article 72 of the Constitution of India by Justice C.S. Karnan seeking remission of his sentence of six months imposed on him by a seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court, preferred through his counsels, Shri Mathews J.Nedumpara, B.K.Adhikari, A.C.Philip and C.J.Joveson Ref. : 1. The memorandum dated 17.05.2017, under article 72 of the Constitution by Hon'ble Shri Justice C.S. Karnan, Judge, High Court of Judicature...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Deepasthambham Mahascharyam Namukkum Kittanam Panam

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

'-Mathews J.Nedumpara The Supreme Court in Keshavanada Bharati held that the “basic structure” of the constitution is inviolable though fundamental rights could be violated. In Indira Nehru Gandhi and Minerva Mills it was held that from 24.04.1973, the validity of a statute has to be tested on the Basic Structure. Independence of Judiciary is one of the Basic features of the constitution. The independence of the judiciary is not about the independent discharge of the functions of a judge subsequent to his appointment but is all about the very appointment, i.e., who appoints. Who appoints the judges is the core of...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Justice Karnan WP on Vires of Contempt of Court Act

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2017 In the matter of Article 32 of the Constitution of India; AND In the matter of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; AND In the matter of Sections 2(c), 12, 14(3) and 17(5) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; AND In the matter of Section 3 of the Judges Protection Act, 1985; Justice C. S. Karnan Adult, Indian Inhabitant, residing at Harbour Heights, “W” Wing 12-F, 12th Floor, Sassoon Docks, Colaba, Mumbai-400 005. …PETITIONER Versus The Hon'ble, The Chief Justice, Supreme Court of India through its Registrar General. The Union of India, represented by its Secretary in the Department...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

J.C.S.Karnan_Review Petition of Judgment(Through Jail Suptd.)

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

SECTION………. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL/CRIMINAL/ORIGINAL/ APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A.(CIVIL/CRIMINAL)NO……………………………………..OF 2017. SPECIAL LEAVE PETITIONER(CIVIL/CRL) NO……………….OF 2017 WRIT/TRANSFER PETITION(CIVIL/CRL) NO.………………….OF 2017 Civil/criminal appeal NO. ………………………………OF 2017 REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. ……………………………… OF 2017 IN SUO MOTU CONMT.PET.(C)NO.1 OF 2017 Justice C.S. Karnan ………..Review Petitioner IN THE MATTER OF: Supreme Court of India on its own motion … Suo Moto Versus Justice C.S. Karnan … Original Alleged Contemnor/Respondent INDEX SRL No PARTICULARS COPIES PAGE NO COURT FEES 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Total Rs. Certified that the copies are correct Filed on:11.07.2017 FILED BY (MATHEWS J.NEDUMPRARA) Advocates for the Petitioner mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com (Mobile: 09820535428) & (A.C.PHILIP) (Copy of Identity card of the person filing) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. _____ OF 2017 IN SUO MOTU CONMT.PET.(C)NO.1 OF 2017 (Seeking review of the judgments dated 09/05/2017...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

J.C.S.Karnan_Review Petition of Judgment(08.07.2017_ ACP+CJJ)

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. _____ OF 2017 IN SUO MOTU CONMT.PET.(C)NO.1 OF 2017 ((Seeking review of the judgments dated 09/05/2017 & 04/07/2017 passed by this Hon’ble Court in SUO MOTU CONMT.PET.(C) NO.1 OF 2017) Justice C.S. Karnan ………..Review Petitioner IN THE MATTER OF: Supreme Court of India on its own motion … Suo Moto Versus Justice C.S. Karnan … Original Alleged Contemnor/Respondent OFFICE REPORT ON LIMITATION The review petition is within time. The Petition is barred by time and there is a delay of _____days in filing the same against orders dated 09/05/2017 & 04/07/2017 and application for condonation of ___days delay...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

J.C.S.Karnan_Review Petition Covering Letter to Secretary General

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA Advocate NEDUMPARA & NEDUMPARA Law Firm 304, Hari Chambers, 3rd Floor, 58-64, S.B.S. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400 023 & 210, PrasannaVihar Apartments, Near High Court, Cochin, Kerala-682 031 Ph: +91 98205 35428(M), 02222626634, 04842368737, 02222626432,01122146145 E-mail: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com To Ld.Secretary General, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi-1. Sub: Filing of: REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. _____ OF 2017 IN SUO MOTU CONMT.PET.(C)NO.1 OF 2017 (Seeking review of the judgments dated 09/05/2017 & 04/07/2017 passed by this Hon’ble Court in SUO MOTU CONMT.PET.(C) NO.1 OF 2017) Justice C.S. Karnan ………..Review Petitioner IN THE MATTER OF: Supreme Court of India on its own motion … Suo Moto Versus Justice C.S. Karnan … Original Alleged Contemnor/Respondent Sir, Being the duly...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Writ Petition for law against judicial defamation by Mathews J Nedumpara

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINAY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. ______ OF 2018 Mathews J Nedumpara Aged: 59 Years, Occ. Practicing Advocate Adult, Indian Inhabitant, residing at Harbour Heights, 12-F, 12th Floor, Sassoon Docks, Colaba, Mumbai-400 005. ……Petitioner Versus The Hon’ble Shri Justice S J Kathawalla, Judge, The Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Mumbai-36. …..Respondent TO THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE OTHER HONOURABLE PUISNE JUDGES OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT HUMBLE PETITION OF THE PETITIONER ABOVE NAMED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Letter to the PM demanding review of the NJAC case by the Union of India

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

TELEGRAPHIC LETTER FOR THE ATTENTION OF PM 29 April 2018 To, Hon’ble Sri Narendra Modi, The Prime Minister of India Room No. 246, South Block, Raisina Hills, New Delhi Hon’ble Sri Modi Ji Subject: 1. Review of the NJAC case 2. Dismantling of the collegium 3. Audience with your kind self. Ref: Umpteen letters addressed to your Hon’ble self, some of which have not even been acknowledged. I address you sir, in a telegraphic language as the President of NLC in the hope that atleast this will receive your personal attention in view of the great national importance of the subject. 1. I was the only person who instituted a Substantive Petition...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Notes of Argument in the High Court of Kerala.

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO 11086 OF 2018 C J Joveson ...

Blogs

Disclaimer: