Blogs

Mathews J. Nedumpara > Blogs (Page 11)

Simple solution for reducing pendency of cases is to do away with “precedents” nay, repeal of Article 141 of the Constitution

Simple solution for reducing pendency of cases is to do away with “precedents” nay, repeal of Article 141 of the Constitution. Mathews J. Nedumpara “Simple things can be done in simple ways; Hard things too can be done in simple ways; But it requires an inventive brain And can be done without much strain” 1. The above words of a poet, I believe, should be the guiding lamp when we think of judicial reforms. There are two streams of administration of justice, one, the civil law system followed in the European continent and the Latin America, and the other the common law system followed in UK, India, America...

Continue reading

To the faithful of the Syrian Orthodox Church of Antioch and all the East, my fellow countrymen

Adv. Mathews J. Nedumpara 9820535428 26.7.2020 To the faithful of the Syrian Orthodox Church of Antioch and all the East, my fellow countrymen 1. The faithful of the Syrian Orthodox church of Antioch and all the East, (the Patriarch faction) are denied their freedom of conscience and faith guaranteed by the Constitution of India; not by the government or any law enacted by the Parliament, but as a result of judgements of the Supreme Court. My clients, the faithful of the Syrian Orthodox church- the Patriarch faction, blame Justice Mishra of the Supreme Court. And the extent of their anger, pain and anguish is...

Continue reading

Ne bis in idem, the simple solution for mounting arrears

Ne bis in idem, the simple solution for mounting arrears Mathews J. Nedumpara 9820535428 1. Faced with the mind-boggling burden of arrears which today is more than 3.4 crores in the case of the subordinate courts and more than 51.5 lakhs in the case of the High Courts and even 62,064 in the case of the Supreme Court, our legislature and the superior Courts invoking even legislative powers, which the founding fathers had never visualized, have created large number of tribunals in substitution of the Civil Court, even the High Court. However, far from reducing the backlogs, such laws and tribunals have contributed...

Continue reading

Shri. Mukal Rohotgi, a failed Attorney General?

Mathews J Nedumpara President, NLC. 28.06.2020. Shri. Mukal Rohotgi, a failed Attorney General? Shri. Mukal Rohotgi's lamentations on the NJAC judgement is absolutely lacking in bonafides. In all humility, I must say that I attended the entire hearing of the case spanning over 31 days, a drama enacted by Mr. Fali Nariman and company to protect their fortress. The SCORA was a mere pawn. I was the only person other than the Central and State governments in support of the NJAC questioning the very maintainability of the so called PIL of SCORA. I pleaded that the maintainability of the PIL be decided as a...

Continue reading

National Lawyers’ Campaign For Judicial Transparency And Reforms 31.3.2014

National Lawyers' Campaign For Judicial Transparency And Reforms 31.3.2014 Objectives 1) Abolition of Collegium system of appointment and transfer of judges and the substitution of the same by an independent judicial appointments commission where neither the executive nor the judiciary will have a primacy.The NJAC shall advertise the vacancies and invite applications from all eligible candidates; 2) Creation of a Judicial Ombudsman to deal with the complaints of corruption and malpractices against judges; 3) Audio/video-recording of proceedings of all Courts and Tribunals and access to such records to the litigants, lawyers and public; 4) Reintroduction of the policy of transfer of 1/3rd of judges out of their...

Continue reading

An open letter to the Hon’ble PM, CJI, Chief Justices of the High Courts, Members of Parliament

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA President NATIONAL LAWYERS’ CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY AND REFORMS 12 F, A Wing, Narayan A Sawant Rd, Azad Nagar, Colaba, Mumbai 400005 E-mail: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com Mob:9820535428 13.3.2021 AN OPEN LETTER TO THE HON’BLE PM, CJI, CHIEF JUSTICES OF THE HIGH COURTS, MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT Hon’ble Sirs and Mesdames, 1. When Hon’ble Justice Indu Malhotra was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India, the undersigned, who is only too conscious of his insignificance, had an immense sense of happiness and joy. There is yet another instance where I was extremely jubilant, that was when the NJAC bill was introduced in the Parliament. Mrs. Indu...

Continue reading

Are not the civil courts the real ‘constitutional courts’?

Are not the civil courts the real 'constitutional courts'? 14.4.2020 Mathews J Nedumpara In the last two decades or so, we have often heard the elite lawyers in Delhi referring to the Supreme Court as constitutional courts which gives the impression to the common man that the Supreme court and High courts are the only courts empowered to interpret the constitution. The question is, in doing so, are they not committing a fraud on the constitution. I have, in my article titled, 'Ten myths of constitutional law', dealt with at some length of the falsehoods which have become gospel truths and to doubt...

Continue reading

Supreme Court of India or the Court of Henry ll?

Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 12.5.2021 Supreme Court of India or the Court of Henry ll? Many of us may not know our connection with the Roman law. Julius Caesar invaded Britain in 55 BC and England was under the Roman rule from AD 43 to AD 410. The Romans made many highways, some of which are in existence even today. I make a mention of highways because it has a connection with our criminal jurisprudence. In the early medieval days, all crimes were not considered as an offence against the king and his peace. Offences like treason, disseisin (seizing of land belonging to...

Continue reading

Saving the Maradu Homes- Amendment of the CRZ to give it retrospective effect is the simplest and ethical solution

The Complete text of the article written by Shri Mathews J. Nedumpara which is published in the Times of India, today. Saving the Maradu Homes- Amendment of the CRZ to give it retrospective effect is the simplest and ethical solution The supreme court ordered demolition of the 5 Buildings (apartments) at Maradu, Cochin on the finding that, it is in violation of CRZ-III. The Supreme court did not take notice of the fact that by notification issued in 2011 by the Central Government, Maradu was brought under the CRZ-II which would mean that if the buildings in question if were to be...

Continue reading

Referring Questions of Law to Larger Benches is in Ignorance of the Doctrine of Stare Decisis

Mathews J Nedumpara Some members of the legal fraternity have criticized me for authoring article titled 'Referring Questions of Law to Larger Benches is in Ignorance of the Doctrine of Stare Decisis' as it amounts to too sharp a criticism of the Supreme Court. When i was a young lawyer, for instance when the Judges 2 case was delivered, i felt the judgement to be a re-writing of the constitution. The Supreme Court snatching away the powers of the executive. I felt the Judges 2 case cannot even be called a judgement because there was no cause of action. There existed...

Continue reading

Disclaimer:


The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to our firm of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation or advertisement by us. The contents of this website is intended purely for educational and informational purposes and should not be construed as soliciting, advertisement or as legal advice.


The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Nedumpara & Nedumpara. No material on this site may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted or distributed in any way without the prior written permission of Nedumpara & Nedumpara.