09 July

Sticky

Kinship Chart of the judges of the Supreme Court of India

Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 5.02.2025 Kinship Chart of the judges of the Supreme Court of India The preparation of the chart has been no mean task, for no official data is available. The data has been collected from members of the bar across the country who volunteered information. The chart is not complete. It may also contain certain inaccuracies. However, for all practical purpose the chart does paint complete picture of the nepotism and favoritism in the appointment of judges and the designation of lawyers as senior advocates. The data above would undoubtedly show that there can hardly be a case where the...

09 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Abolition of senior designation case listed tomorrow ie 7th Feb 2025 in SCI

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Mathews J. Nedumpara 98205 35428 6.2.2025 Abolition of senior designation case listed tomorrow ie 7th Feb 2025 in SCI The petition under Article 32 instituted by my humble self and 19 others seeking a declaration that Sections 16 and 23(5) of the Advocates Act are void inasmuch as it divides lawyers into two classes which only serves the elite at the cost of equally, if not more, competent and deserving lawyers who are not from privileged backgrounds and has led to the legal profession and the higher echelons of the judiciary being monopolized, if not, hijacked by a few scores of families, is listed...

09 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Nothing is more laughable and contrary to the elementary principles of jurisprudence than the so-called basic structure theory, based on which the Supreme Court has rendered hundreds of judgements and even quashed the NJAC

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Nothing is more laughable and contrary to the elementary principles of jurisprudence than the so-called basic structure theory, based on which the Supreme Court has rendered hundreds of judgements and even quashed the NJAC Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 It is known even to a law student that only a person aggreived, namely, one whose rights are infringed, alone can go to a Court, and where the fundamental rights are infringed, one could go straight to the Supreme Court under Article 32. Without pleading infringement of a right, no one can go to a court. This is a universal principle. But the celebrated...

09 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Distinction between judgement in rem and personam.

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

*Mathews J. Nedumpara* 98205 35428 23.02.2025 Distinction between judgement in rem and personam. Proceedings in rem does not mean that a Court can, by its judgment, affect the rights of a person who is not a party before it. No court has the power to adversely affect the rights of a person who is not before it, no matter whether the proceedings are in rem or in personam. The perception that a person’s rights can be adversely affected without him on the party array for the reason that the proceedings in question is in rem, is a misconception. It only means that where a...

09 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Criminal Appeal No. – of 2025 (Arising out of SLP (CRL.) No. 4299 of 2024)

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Open Letters

*Abolition of Senior Designation* An open letter. *Mathews J Nedumpara* 98205 35428 10.03.2025. To *The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India* May it please your Lordship, Sub: Criminal Appeal No. – of 2025 (Arising out of SLP (CRL.) No. 4299 of 2024) Jitender@Kalla Appellant Versus State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.. Respondent 1.A division bench of this Hon’ble Court consisting of their Lordships Justice A S Oka and Justice A G Masih while disposing of the aforesaid criminal appeal has been pleased to direct the registry of the Court to place a copy of their judgment before your Lordship to consider whether the issues flagged by the Bench deserve to be...

09 July

0 Comments

Sticky

There is no res judicata, estoppel, waiver or acquiescence against law, particularly one which casts a public duty on a statutory authority. Read the Argument notes by Nedumpara.

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM W.P. (C) No. 42050 of 2025 M/s. Sark Spice Products Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. …Petitioners V/s Reserve Bank of India & Ors. …Respondents ARGUMENT NOTES FILED BY THE COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS I. The case of the Petitioners i. The Petitioner is an MSME (Small enterprise) registered under the MSMED Act. The notification dated 29.5.2015 mandates the Banks and financial institutions to constitute a committee and make an application to it at least when the bank notices a default in the account of an MSME, namely, where the principal and interest have not been serviced for a period...

17 June

0 Comments

Sticky

Our Interpretation of Constitutional Law has Become a Classic Example of Human Stupidity

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Our Interpretation of Constitutional Law has Become a Classic Example of Human Stupidity *Mathews J Nedumpara* 98205 35428 Two things are infinite, said Einstein: the universe and human stupidity. Our interpretation of constitutional law has become a classic example of human stupidity. Let me explain. The common law is our law by virtue of Article 372 of the constitution. It is founded on two simple principles, ‘res judicata’ and ‘stare decisis’, namely, precedent. Res judicata means a decision in a case between A and B will bind and them, but not C and D who were not parties to it, in other words, it...

17 June

0 Comments

Sticky

To declare that the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is unconstitutional and void, or at least Sections 2(c)(i), 14, 16 and 17(5)

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Sub: To declare that the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is unconstitutional and void, or at least Sections 2(c)(i), 14, 16 and 17(5) thereof IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN ITS EXTRA-ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION W. P.(C) NO. 14564OF 2016 Mathews J. Nedumpara … Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. … Respondents MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Counsel for the Petitioner P.BIJIMON (B-732) (K/3173/1999) JACOB SAMUEL (J-1316) (K/259/1997 Room No.210, 2nd Floor, Prasanna Vihar Appartments, Near High Court of Kerala, Cochin-682 031 Ph.No.0484-2368737 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN ITS EXTRA-ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION W. P.(C) NO. 14564OF 2016 Mathews J. Nedumpara … Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. … Respondents I...

09 June

0 Comments

Sticky

SUPREME COURT MUST ACT AS ONE AND BE ONE”?!

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

“SUPREME COURT MUST ACT AS ONE AND BE ONE”?! *_-Mathews J. Nedumpara_* What prompted me to pen these few lines is the recent Free Press Journal front page headline, “Supreme Court must act as one and be one”. The newspaper report quoted Justice Kurien Joseph saying, “the system exists on certain holy principles, tinkering with it will have no end and the institution will go for ever…when the court is one, it must act as one. If you want it to be one, you will have to make it one.” Justice Joseph so observed while on Bench with Justices Lokur and Gupta. *I...

09 June

0 Comments

Sticky

Good men must not obey the law too well” – video recording of court proceedings and its circulation

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Good men must not obey the law too well” – video recording of court proceedings and its circulation Mathews J. Nedumpara 98205 35428 17.03.2025. The Kerala High Court took objection to our recording of the proceedings and sharing of the same. Though not done by me personally, I have no hesitation to take responsibility. Several MSMEs perturbed by the unfortunate fact that the Courts have been denying them the benefit of the notification which has received the assent of both houses of the Parliament which prohibits recovery action except with the permission of the committee, record the VC proceedings, at the various forums, High...

Disclaimer: