26 February

Sticky

Simple solution for reducing pendency of cases is to do away with “precedents” nay, repeal of Article 141 of the Constitution

Simple solution for reducing pendency of cases is to doaway with “precedents” nay, repeal of Article 141 of theConstitution.Mathews J. Nedumpara “Simple things can be done in simple ways;Hard things too can be done in simple ways;But it requires an inventive brainAnd can be done without much strain” The above words of a poet, I believe, should be the guiding lamp when we think of judicial reforms. There are two streams of administration of justice, one, the civil law system followed in the European continent and the Latin America, and the other the common law system followed in UK, India, America and...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Nedumpara’s Letter To The Prime Minister Complaining Nepotism In Judges’ Appointment

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Mathews J NedumparaPresident , NLCOPEN LETTER04.06.2020 Hon'ble Shri. Narendra ModiPrime Minister of IndiaNew DelhiHon'ble Shri S A Bobde,Chief Justice of India.Hon'ble the Chief Justice of Rajasthan.Hon'ble Shri Ashok Galot,Chief Minister of Rajasthan. Sirs, Sub: The reported decision of the collegium of the Rajasthan High Court recommending 17 names for appointment as judges of the Rajasthan High Court. I address this letter with great amount of pain and agony. I wish i were not to address this letter. But I have no choice. As the President of the National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms, an organization registered under the Maharashtra Public Charitable Trust...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Sabarimala case

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Open Letters

SABARIMALA CASEParturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus-Mathews J Nedumpara9.2.2020 The National Ayyappa Devotees’ Association (NADA) was the first entity to challenge the judgment of the Five-Judge Constitution Bench in WP No. 373/2006 (the Sabarimala case) holding that Rule 3(b) of the Kerala Places of Public Worship (Authorization of Entry) Rules, 1965, which restricts women of menstruating age from entering the shrine of Lord Ayyappa at Sabarimala, as unconstitutional. The Review Petition filed by it was the second of the large number of Review Petitions seeking review of the judgment in the Sabarimala case. In the petition instituted under Article 32, the NADA...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Criticizing Bar Council amounts to misconduct

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

27.06.2021 "Criticizing Bar Council amounts to misconduct"? Every man has a right to his reputation and nobody has a right to violate it. This is undeniable and has been recognized from the early days of Roman law, all legal systems. Advocates, and for that matter even the judges have no right to violate the right of reputation. When the common people violate it, they will have to face the consequence of criminal and civil proceedings for defamation and even contempt. Lawyers certainly are not above law. But at the same time, any attempt to silence criticism and dissent in the name of...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

“Criticizing Bar Council amounts to misconduct”?

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Every man has a right to his reputation and nobody has a right to violate it. This is undeniable and has been recognized from the early days of Roman law, all legal systems. Advocates, and for that matter even the judges have no right to violate the right of reputation. When the common people violate it, they will have to face the consequence of criminal and civil proceedings for defamation and even contempt. Lawyers certainly are not above law. But at the same time, any attempt to silence criticism and dissent in the name of protecting judges or any authority,...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Video-Recording Of Proceedings Of Courts And Tribunals – A Panacea For The Ills Which Indian Judiciary Faces Today

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

VIDEO-RECORDING OF PROCEEDINGS OF COURTS AND TRIBUNALS – A PANACEA FOR THE ILLS WHICH INDIAN JUDICIARY FACES TODAY.Mathews J Nedumpara What prompts me to pen these few lines is a query from one of the few law students who started interning with me recently. The query was, what is the inspiration for me to initiate the campaign titled National Lawyers’ Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms and the video-recording of proceedings of all Courts and Tribunals in the country as its prime objective. I had no difficulty to answer the query because of the injustice which I personally had to undergo, for,...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Open Letter to Justice Kurien Joseph

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

3rd December 2018 To Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph,Former Judge, Supreme Court of India,New Delhi. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR LORDSHIP: Today’s Times of India, on its front page, carried an article by Mr. Dhananjay Mohapatra, one of the illustrious legal reporters of the country, under the caption “We felt the then CJI was remote-controlled: Joseph”. Within the said main heading, there was a sub-heading titled “Ex Supreme Court Judge says minority tag hinders careers”. Under the said caption Your Lordship is reported to have said “the minority tag is a hindrance to career progression of members of...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Progeny Judges’ Syndrome Chart- Chief Justices of HCs

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Progeny Syndrome Chart- Chief Justices of HCs ...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Our Interpretation of Constitutional Law has Become a Classic Example of Human Stupidity

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

Mathews J Nedumpara Two things are infinite, said Einstein: the universe and human stupidity. Our interpretation of constitutional law has become a classic example of human stupidity. Let me explain. Suppose, in a case between A and B the majority of a Bench of 5 judges of the Supreme Court, say, by a majority of 4:1, hold that a goat is a dog that will be absolutely binding on A and B who are parties as ‘res judicata’, though it is a manifestly erroneous. Otherwise there will not be an end to litigation, finality. However, that decision will not bind C and...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Basic structure theory – a proposition contrary to the first principles of jurisprudence

Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara

in Blogs/Articles

BASIC STRUCTURE THEORY - A PROPOSITION CONTRARY TO THE FIRST PRINCIPLES OF JURISPRUDENCE.Mathews J Nedumpara9820535428 Kesavananda Bharati's case is hailed to be the most important judgment ever rendered by the Supreme Court of India. The case was heard by the full court consisting of 13 judges. The case was argued for 6 months and the judgment consists of half a million words. Even the common people have heard of the judgment. In the said case, the Supreme Court laid down a doctrine called 'basic structure' and said that while the Parliament could amend every article of the constitution including those concerning...

Disclaimer: