Our Interpretation of Constitutional Law has Become a Classic Example of Human Stupidity

Our Interpretation of Constitutional Law has Become a Classic Example of Human Stupidity *Mathews J Nedumpara*   98205 35428 Two things are infinite, said Einstein: the universe and human stupidity. Our interpretation of constitutional law has become a classic example of human stupidity. Let me explain. The common law is our law by virtue of Article 372 of the constitution. It is founded on two simple principles, ‘res judicata’ and ‘stare decisis’, namely, precedent. Res judicata means a decision in a case between A and B will bind and them, but not C and D who were not parties to it, in other words, it...

Continue reading

To declare that the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is unconstitutional and void, or at least Sections 2(c)(i), 14, 16 and 17(5)

Sub: To declare that the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is unconstitutional and void, or at least Sections 2(c)(i), 14, 16 and 17(5) thereof IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN ITS EXTRA-ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION W. P.(C) NO. 14564OF 2016 Mathews J. Nedumpara … Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. … Respondents MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Counsel for the Petitioner P.BIJIMON (B-732) (K/3173/1999) JACOB SAMUEL (J-1316) (K/259/1997 Room No.210, 2nd Floor, Prasanna Vihar Appartments, Near High Court of Kerala, Cochin-682 031 Ph.No.0484-2368737 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN ITS EXTRA-ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION W. P.(C) NO. 14564OF 2016 Mathews J. Nedumpara … Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. … Respondents I...

Continue reading

SUPREME COURT MUST ACT AS ONE AND BE ONE”?!

“SUPREME COURT MUST ACT AS ONE AND BE ONE”?! *_-Mathews J. Nedumpara_* What prompted me to pen these few lines is the recent Free Press Journal front page headline, “Supreme Court must act as one and be one”. The newspaper report quoted Justice Kurien Joseph saying, “the system exists on certain holy principles, tinkering with it will have no end and the institution will go for ever…when the court is one, it must act as one. If you want it to be one, you will have to make it one.” Justice Joseph so observed while on Bench with Justices Lokur and Gupta. *I...

Continue reading

Good men must not obey the law too well” – video recording of court proceedings and its circulation

Good men must not obey the law too well” – video recording of court proceedings and its circulation Mathews J. Nedumpara 98205 35428 17.03.2025.   The Kerala High Court took objection to our recording of the proceedings and sharing of the same. Though not done by me personally, I have no hesitation to take responsibility. Several MSMEs perturbed by the unfortunate fact that the Courts have been denying them the benefit of the notification which has received the assent of both houses of the Parliament which prohibits recovery action except with the permission of the committee, record the VC proceedings, at the various forums, High...

Continue reading

Representation made in furtherance of the order of the Supreme Court dated 21.05.2025 in WP(C) no. 534/2025. Registration of FIR and expeditious, meaningful investigation into the incident of recovery of large amounts of burned cash at the residence of Justice Yashwant Varma of the Delhi High Court who has since been transferred to the Allahabad High Court – Reg.

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA President National Lawyers’ Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms 101, Gundecha Chambers, Nagindas Master Rd, Kala Ghoda, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400001 Mob: +91 98205 35428/94471 65650 E-mail: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com 26.5.2025 For the kind personal attention of his Excellency To, Hon’ble Shri Narendra Modi Prime Minister of India, New Delhi May it please your Excellency, Sub: Representation made in furtherance of the order of the Supreme Court dated 21.05.2025 in WP(C) no. 534/2025. Registration of FIR and expeditious, meaningful investigation into the incident of recovery of large amounts of burned cash at the residence of Justice Yashwant Varma of the Delhi High Court who has since been transferred to the Allahabad High...

Continue reading

To declare that the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is unconstitutional and void, or at least Sections 2(c)(i), 14, 16 and 17(5)

Sub: To declare that the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is unconstitutional and void, or at least Sections 2(c)(i), 14, 16 and 17(5) thereof IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN ITS EXTRA-ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION W. P.(C) NO. 14564OF 2016 Mathews J. Nedumpara … Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. … Respondents MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Counsel for the Petitioner P.BIJIMON (B-732) (K/3173/1999) JACOB SAMUEL (J-1316) (K/259/1997 Room No.210, 2nd Floor, Prasanna Vihar Appartments, Near High Court of Kerala, Cochin-682 031 Ph.No.0484-2368737 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN ITS EXTRA-ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION W. P.(C) NO. 14564OF 2016 Mathews J. Nedumpara … Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. … Respondents I...

Continue reading

Request for an audience with Your Excellency in pursuance of the order of the Supreme Court in the matter of registration of an FIR against Justice Varma (Burned Cash at Judge’s Home Scam) – regarding.

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA President National Lawyers’ Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms MH/MUM/1701/2015/GBBSD 101, Gundecha Chambers, Nagindas Master Road, Kala Ghoda, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra– 400 001. Email ID: nedumparaassociates@gmail.com Contact No.:9820535428/9967969256 Date: 03.06.2025 To, Her Excellency Smt. Droupadi Murmu, President of India, Rashtrapati Bhavan, Raisina Hills New Delhi – 110 004   May it please your Excellency, Subject: Request for an audience with Your Excellency in pursuance of the order of the Supreme Court in the matter of registration of an FIR against Justice Varma (Burned Cash at Judge's Home Scam) - regarding.   1.The fact that even after lapse of more than 10 weeks after the recovery of large amounts of cash, burnt and unburnt,...

Continue reading

Protection from defamation in a judicial proceedings – Concerted act on the part of Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. Jamdar to malign and defame me, a lawyer – Complaint reg.

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA Advocate 101, Gundecha Chambers, Nagindas Master Rd, Kala Ghoda, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400001 Mob: +91 98205 35428/94471 65650/ 99679 69256 E-mail: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com nedumparaaasociates@gmail.com 7.6.2025 To, Hon’ble Shri Alok Aradhe, Chief Justice, High court of Bombay. May it please your lordship, Sub: Protection from defamation in a judicial proceedings – Concerted act on the part of Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. Jamdar to malign and defame me, a lawyer – Complaint reg. 1. My tryst with the justice delivery system began at a young age in 1979 as a litigant in the Munsiff Court, Pala. I conducted the case mostly as a party in person up to the Supreme Court....

Continue reading

For the kind personal attention of her Excellency

Representation made in furtherance of the order of the Supreme Court dated 21.05.2025 in WP(C) no. 534/2025. Registration of FIR and expeditious, meaningful investigation into the incident of recovery of large amounts of burned cash at the residence of Justice Yashwant Varma of the Delhi High Court who has since been transferred to the Allahabad High Court – Reg Click Here To Download - Representation 26 MAY 2025...

Continue reading

Examining Judicial Review and Curative Jurisprudence: A Critical Analysis

Examining Judicial Review and Curative Jurisprudence: A Critical Analysis Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 a)Review petitions (civil) dismissed- 19710 Allowed- 92 b) Review Petitions (Crl) Dismissed- 6087 Allowed- 48 c) Curative petitions (civil) Dismissed- 2155 Allowed- 0 d) Curative petitions (Crl) Dismissed- 620 Allowed- 3 So far as curative petitions go, I am not concerned. The curative jurisprudence itself is against the constitution, a judicial legislation, which no court has the power to do. I consider this mechanism to be in ignorance of the elementary jurisprudence. The court failed to comprehend the distinction between res judicata and stare decisis and mistook one for the other, which would be evident anyone who reads Hurra v. Hurra,...

Continue reading

Disclaimer:


The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to our firm of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation or advertisement by us. The contents of this website is intended purely for educational and informational purposes and should not be construed as soliciting, advertisement or as legal advice.


The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Nedumpara & Nedumpara. No material on this site may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted or distributed in any way without the prior written permission of Nedumpara & Nedumpara.