BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Writ Appeal. No. In of 2024 W.P. (C) No. 41576 of 2023
BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMWrit Appeal No.Inof 2024W.P. (C) No. 41576 of 2023(Against the Judgment dated 24-10-2024 of this Honourable Court in W.P. (C) No. 41576/2023) P.K. KRISHNA KUMAR & ANR : Appellants/PetitionersVs.INDUSIND BANK & ORS : Respondents/Respondents S Y N O P S I S The impugned Judgment suffers from […]
Writ Petition Filed in 2016 Against the Outdated and Barbaric Law of Contempt
Sub: To declare that the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is unconstitutional and void, or at least Sections 2(c)(i), 14, 16 and 17(5) thereof IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN ITS EXTRA-ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION W. P.(C) NO. 14564OF 2016 Mathews J. Nedumpara […]
K.C THARAKAN WRIT PETITION IN Hon’b;e Supreme Court U/s Article 32 of Indian Constitution
K.C THARAKAN WRIT PETITION IN Hon’b;e Supreme Court U/s Article 32 of Indian Constitution Mathews J Nedumpara IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. ______ OF 2022 UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IN THE MATTER OF: K.C. THARAKAN …Petitioner(s) VERSUS 1. STATE BANK OF INDIA Represented by its Chairman, Corporate Office, Vidhan […]
Are not the civil courts the real ‘constitutional courts’?
Posted by Mathews J Nedumpara Are not the civil courts the real ‘constitutional courts’?– Mathews J Nedumpara1st July 202098205 35428 In the last two decades or so, we have often heard the elite lawyers in Delhi referring to the Supreme Court as constitutional courts which gives the impression to the common man that the Supreme court and […]
Banks and Financial Institutions cannot simultaneously initiate recovery proceedings under both the SARFAESI Act and the RDB Act; judgments holding otherwise are rendered per incuriam and sub silentio, and are not binding..
Click on the link below to read full article👇 SC Converted WP_Sark Spice_Parallel proceedings
Why Justice Krishna Iyer said “Contempt power cipherises its user
Mathews J. Nedumpara 8.2.2023 1. What prompts me to pen these lines are the news reports that the Kerala High Court has initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Shri K.M Shahjahan, Private Secretary to Shri V.S Achuthanandan, the former Chief Minister of Kerala. Shri K.M Shahjahan has reportedly alleged that it was not merely, Adv […]
When a matter is part heard, to take precipitatory action is nothing short of contempt of court
MATHEWS NEDUMPARA ADVOCATES 101,Gundecha Chamber, Nagindas Master Road, fort, Mumbai – 400 001. Email id: nedumparaassociates@gmail.com Contact No. 9447165650/9820535428 ===================================================================================== To, 12.09.2025 1. Raval Shah & Co. Advocate for ICICI Bank Building no. 5-7, Rajabahadur Mansion, Homi Modi street, fort, Mumbai – 400 023. 2. Yahya Batatawala Advocate for IRP Office no. 311, 3rd Floor, […]
An order pronounced in open court cannot be altered except in an open court hearing
Speaking to the minutes of the order dated 3rd September, 2025, conducted through VC 1. The popular concept among litigants, lawyers and even judges is that what constitutes an order or judgment which binds the party before the court is the order which is signed by the judge and authenticated and made available to the […]
Why the basic structure is a fraud on the constitution – explained in a few words
Mathews j nedumpara 98205 35428 14th September 2025 I am often asked why I call the “basic structure” a laughable theory. I can answer this in a few words by citing an example. If one were to invoke Article 32 prior to Kesavananda Bharati, the judges would unfailingly ask “why are you here? And […]
Yashwant varma review article
Click Below To Read Full Article 👇 YASHWANT VERMA REVIEW APPLIATION