Articles
All articles
Litigants, listen to my words seriously; never invoke Article 226, and certainly not in the Bombay High Court; denial of justice is a fait accompli.
Mathews J Nedumpara98205 354281st May 2026. 1.My message is clear from the very title of this article itself. These
ARGUMENT NOTES BY SHRI MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA IN THE SABARIMALA CASE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTIONREVIEW PETITION (DIARY) NO. 37946 of 2018INWP (C) NO. 273/2006 Argument notes by
The Supreme Court of India has been hijacked by dynasties of lawyers and judges. What is the way out?
Mathews J Nedumpara98205 3542820th April 2026 The maximum strength of the Supreme Court is 34 judges. It operates for approximately
Kejriwal did nothing wrong in video-recording the court proceedings and circulating them; it is high time the courts held the torch inwards and realized that whatever happens in the seat of justice, the public has a right to know.
Mathews J Nedumpara98205 3542824th April 2026. The court exercises the sovereign judicial function of the state, namely “we the people.”
The Supreme Court of India has been hijacked by dynasties of lawyers and judges. What is the way out?
Mathews J Nedumpara98205 3542820th April 2026 The maximum strength of the Supreme Court is 34 judges. It operates for approximately
The urgent need to suo motu recall the judgment of a 5-judge bench in Mullaperiyar Environmental Protection Forum v. Union of India holding that the judgment of this Court of 2006 which holds that the Mullaperiyar dam is safe, is binding in perpetuity as res judicata, thereby putting the lives of more than 5 million people of Kerala in jeopardy.
MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARAAdvocate101, Gundecha Chambers, Nagindas Master Rd, Kala Ghoda, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400001Mob: +91 98205 35428/99679 69256E-mail: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com 1st
Stay Informed with Legal Insights
Get the latest legal news, case studies, and jurisdiction updates delivered to your preferred channel
- SMS