If you are a common man and invoke Article 226 of the Bombay High Court, denial of justice is a fait accompli.
If you file a suit it will be decided on merits, no matter whether you engage a kith and kin of judges or otherwise favoured, or engage an ordinary lawyer. On the contrary, if you institute a Writ Petition in a High Court, for instance in the Bombay High Court, its fate largely depends upon […]
Open Letter to the CJI — Maria Nedumpara’s Grievance Against Justice Shyam Suman of the Bombay High Court for Mistreatment Without Rhyme or Reason
MARIA NEDUMPARAAdvocate101, Gundecha Chambers, Nagindas Master Rd, Kala Ghoda, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400001Mob: +91 9447165650 E-mail: marianedumpara@gmail.com To,Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. R. Gavai,The Chief Justice of India,Supreme Court, Tilak Marg,New Delhi-110001 Also to,Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shree ChandrashekharThe Chief Justice,High Court of Judicature at BombayMumbai – 400032 May it please your Lordship, Sub: Grievance concerning mistreatment […]
The Bench headed by Justice Dipankar Datta dismissed my Writ Petition under Article 32 seeking registration of an FIR and a just and fair investigation into the incident of huge volumes of burnt cash found at the residence of Justice Yashwant Varma, on the ground that I had not produced, along with the writ petition, my representation seeking investigation, which indeed was produced as Ann. P5 at page 118 of the writ petition. I filed an Application for Review on 16.8.2025. The same is yet to be heard. All review petitions are dismissed in Chambers without any hearing, entirely behind the back of the parties.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIAINHERENT JURISDICTIONREVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2025INWRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 706 OF 2025 (Against the final impugned judgment dated 07.08.2025 passed by this Hon’ble Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 706 of 2025) IN THE MATTER OF:MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA & ORS. PETITIONERSVERSUSTHE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENTSWITHI.A. NO. […]
If Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma of NCLAT, Chennai, was approached by “one of the most revered members of the higher judiciary of this country” — which was what Justice Sharma had said in the open court, apparently for KLSR Infratech Ltd — mere recusal is not the answer; the so-called revered judge of the “higher judiciary” is liable to be proceeded against for contempt of court; otherwise there is no rule of law in this country.
Mathews J. Nedumpara98205 3542826th August 2025 To Respected Sir(s), We, lawyers and citizens, are taken aback by the order of the NCLAT, Chennai Bench dated 13.08.2025, wherein the Bench recorded: “One of us (Member Judicial) has been approached by one of the most revered members of the higher judiciary of this country for seeking an […]
Why does my call for essential, multi-pronged judicial reform remain a voice in the wilderness? Why do good men remain silent?
Mathews J Nedumpara30th March 2026