Articles 226, 32 and Tribunalisation have made the Indian bar ignorant of the elementary principles of jurisprudence.
Young lawyers cannot be entirely blamed for their misconception that the constitutionality of a statute or statutory instrument can only be challenged in the High Court and the Supreme Court under Articles 32 and 226, for even lawyers like Mrs. Indira Jaising were under that wrong impression. That was her plea in invoking Article 32 […]
Letter to the CJ of Gujarat High Court, requesting her not to allow VC hearings to be discontinued.
Mathews J. Nedumpara98205 354284th July 2026 ToThe Chief Justice of GujaratAhmedabad Also To:The Registrar General,High Court of Gujarat. District and Principal Judge, Baroda, Gujarat. May it please Your Ladyship, Sub: Refusal to receive a suit seeking ad interim injunction, apparently because of a request for VC hearing – reg. Virtual hearing facilities were established in […]
If you are a common man and invoke Article 226 in the Bombay High Court, denial of justice is a fait accompli.
Mathews J Nedumpara5th July 202698205 35428 If you file a suit it will be decided on merits, no matter whether you engage a kith and kin of judges or otherwise favoured, or engage an ordinary lawyer. On the contrary, if you institute a Writ Petition in a High Court, for instance in the Bombay High […]