Nedumpara

Letter to the Prime Minister and others forewarning them the hearing of the NJAC case is a mockery and the outcome is a fait accompli, that urgent remedial steps be taken to avert a fraud on the constitution.

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA Senior Partner NEDUMPARA & NEDUMPARA Law Firm 304, Hari Chambers, 3rd Floor, 58-64, S.B.S Road, Fort, Mumbai-23 Mob: +91 9820535428 E-mail: nedumpara2004@yahoo.com, nedumpara2004@hotmail.com Date:24th March, 2015 1)    His Excellency Shri Pranab Mukherjee, President of India, Also to 2) His Excellency Shri H.M. Ansari,   Vice-President of India, 3) Hon’ble Shri Narendra […]

JUDICIAL IMMUNITY/TORTIOUS LIABILITY

Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 23.06.2024. JUDICIAL IMMUNITY/TORTIOUS LIABILITY “Rex non potest peccare”, namely that the king can do no wrong, is a fundamental principle of law. Stated in simple terms, the king is not liable for any action of his agents and servants. This concept, over the centuries, was much diluted with many an […]

No recovery against MSMEs without attempt at revival as provided by law.

Mathews J. Nedumpara 98205 35428 11.09.2024. Economists believe that in a decade or two India is going to be the world’s third largest economy. Our country, once starved for foreign exchange, now probably attracts more foreign exchange than any other country. The reason is the demographic advantage we have. Most of the developed world, Europe, […]

Kinship Chart of the judges of the Supreme Court of India

Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 5.02.2025 Kinship Chart of the judges of the Supreme Court of India The preparation of the chart has been no mean task, for no official data is available. The data has been collected from members of the bar across the country who volunteered information. The chart is not complete. It […]

Abolition of senior designation case listed tomorrow ie 7th Feb 2025 in SCI

Mathews J. Nedumpara 98205 35428 6.2.2025 Abolition of senior designation case listed tomorrow ie 7th Feb 2025 in SCI The petition under Article 32 instituted by my humble self and 19 others seeking a declaration that Sections 16 and 23(5) of the Advocates Act are void inasmuch as it divides lawyers into two classes which […]

Nothing is more laughable and contrary to the elementary principles of jurisprudence than the so-called basic structure theory, based on which the Supreme Court has rendered hundreds of judgements and even quashed the NJAC.

Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 It is known even to a law student that only a person aggreived, namely, one whose rights are infringed, alone can go to a Court, and where the fundamental rights are infringed, one could go straight to the Supreme Court under Article 32. Without pleading infringement of a right, no […]

Distinction between judgement in rem and personam.

Mathews J. Nedumpara 98205 35428 23.02.2025 Distinction between judgement in rem and personam. Proceedings in rem does not mean that a Court can, by its judgment, affect the rights of a person who is not a party before it. No court has the power to adversely affect the rights of a person who is not […]

ONOE Bill passes muster on the basic structure!

Mathews J. Nedumpara 9820535428 12.07.2025 ONOE Bill passes muster on the basic structure! In today’s Times of India, I happened to read that ex-CJIs Khehar and Chandrachud have reportedly told the JPC headed by P. P. Chowdhury that the ONOE Bill passes muster on the basic structure. I am afraid to say that I could […]